A small theory/ Opinion.
A small theory I had.
So we all know Japeth killed Rhian and took his place, we all know.
And some people think Rhian ( Mistral) took his brother Rafal place and the ( Main) series Rafal is Rhian.
So I was thinking of the Parallel of Agatha and Sophie. If Sophie succeeded in Killing Agatha. Would she have taken her place?.
I personally think Sophie cares too much about her Looks to change her appearance to match Agatha ( Considering) Agatha is ( * Supposed *) to be Ugly.
But who knows, Evil people do anything in their power/mind to keep themselves in power.
6 notes
·
View notes
Breaking news! Vicky Vale leaks footage of Brucie Wayne following the new teenage rogue 'Phantom' around the city saying "Please let me adopt you 😭"
Phantom refuses and saying he's a supervillian not a lost puppy.
Turns out this was a part of Bruces plan however as Phantom now sees people all over tv talking about him and the Waynes and already considering him a new member of the family. They're even asking when there will be a face reveal. There was a reason he was wearing a mask! He. Is.. A. Villian. What about that do these people not get?!
Sure he doesn't kill people. Or hurt people at all really. Or steal from small family owned businesses. Or...yeah ok. Just because you're a bad guy doesn't mean you have to be a bad guy, ya know? Apparently Gotham doesn't.
Cause they insist hes just a very confused hero
6K notes
·
View notes
so about the header that proceeded today's statement:
Viability as agent: Low
Viability as subject: None
Viability as catalyst: Medium
i didn't know what to think of this part of the entry at first, but the longer the statement went on... was the institute in this universe trying to manufacture avatars?
the dice can't do anything without someone to use them, they can't be an "agent" by themselves, but might be capable of manipulation, so in that aspect their viability is "low."
the dice could be a "subject" in the sense that they could use further studying, but the statement itself was a very thorough investigation of their workings, so in that aspect their viability is "none."
the dice seem to influence their holder to roll them, or at least find more victims to roll them, and could therefore be described as a "catalyst" for someone's becoming. but, as seen in the statement, their owner can give the dice to someone else (albeit not without consequences), so in that aspect their viability is only "medium."
so what about the line following all this, what does "Recommend referral to Catalytics for Enrichment applicability assessment" mean? if we go by this interpretation, i'd say it could mean the institute wanted to find a way to make the dice even more potent as an artifact, maybe even remove that pesky ability for their owner to reject them.
imho all of this this brings a whole new level of context to the events of episode seven, of unknown violent agents going after an influx of objects that seemed straight out of artifact storage. was that the nature of the titular "magnus protocol" first mentioned in episode four, the one that involved the starkwall group? containing or destroying potential artifacts before the institute could get their hands on them?
it also makes their "gifted kids program," and sam's link to it as one of the kids being studied, all the more horrifying to think about. was it not just avatars in general they were after, but child avatars specifically? no wonder gertrude got so defensive over the possibility of sam and celia dragging gerry back into the institute's business last episode, we all picked up on her clearly knowing more than she's letting on but now we might know the shape of that information a bit better.
and one final bit of food for thought... this statement had a lot of familiar themes, didn't it? free will or the illusion of it, gambling and not-so-random chance, the statement giver being done in by one final hit from what feels like a bit of an addition... all hallmarks of a certain mother of puppets. doesn't it seem fitting that "chester" would use this kind of statement to warn sam about what harm pursuing the magnus institute could bring to him, considering the one his voice might draw from? and doesn't it seem so painfully ironic that his warning seems to have only driven sam further into that web?
308 notes
·
View notes
Thinking about how Mohg is quite literally Miquella’s perfect pick for a vessel to manipulate and cast aside. Thinking about how Mohg is the only one without faith, without love to guide him and yet yearned for it anyways, how both Morgott and Mohg’s character story includes love that is never returned, but they stayed loyal to that love anyways, hoping that one day they might be graced with a single glance their way. But the difference between morgott and Mohg is that morgott would’ve called him a traitor, but Mohg, well, he’s committing blasphemy already, but wouldn’t he want to see the stars again? To be bathed in light that isn’t the false skies of the eternal, buried city? And after all isn’t his dynasty, hidden underground again like mice an attempt at light?
110 notes
·
View notes
hey did the writers ever explain why they chose to make lance a farmer. this is a genuine question btw
452 notes
·
View notes