#Enlightenment and progress

[scklbz]

Opinion | Lessons from Alexandria: A Cautionary Tale for Modern American Politics

By Jet Espinosa In a city once hailed as a beacon of knowledge and tolerance, Alexandria drew people from across the ancient world. It was a place where scholars, thinkers, and believers from diverse backgrounds came to share and preserve their wisdom. With libraries that housed invaluable knowledge in science, philosophy, medicine, and the arts, Alexandria was a symbol of progress and…

[ch-0-sen-1]

[saddayfordemocracy]

José Alberto "Pepe" Mujica Cordano (20 May 1935 – 13 May 2025)

Mr Mujica Cordano was an Uruguayan politician, revolutionary and farmer who served as the 40th president of Uruguay from 2010 to 2015.

He was a former guerrilla with the Tupamaros and was tortured and imprisoned for 14 years during the military dictatorship in the 1970s and 1980s.

"Pepe" was a member of the Broad Front coalition of left-wing parties, Mujica was Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries from 2005 to 2008 and a Senator afterwards.

As the candidate of the Broad Front, he won the 2009 presidential election and took office as president on 1 March 2010.

Mr Mujica had been described as "the world's poorest president" due to his austere lifestyle and his donation of around 90 percent of his US$12,000 monthly salary to charities that benefit poor people and small entrepreneurs.

An outspoken critic of capitalism's focus on stockpiling material possessions which do not contribute to human happiness.

In June 2012, Mr Mujica's government legalize state-controlled sales of marijuana in Uruguay in order to fight drug-related crimes and health issues, and stated that global leaders would be asked to do the same.

Mr Mujica said that by regulating Uruguay's estimated US$40 million-a-year marijuana business, the state would take it away from drug traffickers and weaken the drug cartels. The state would also be able to keep track of all marijuana consumers in the country and provide treatment to the most serious abusers, much like the treatment afforded to alcoholics.

Mr Mujica also passed a same-sex marriage law and legalized abortion.

In September 2013, Mujica addressed the United Nations General Assembly's 68th session, with a long speech devoted to humanity and globalization.The speech called on the international community to strengthen efforts to preserve the planet for future generations and highlighted the power of the financial systems and the impact of economic fallout on ordinary people.

He urged a return to simplicity, with lives founded on human relationships, love, friendship, adventure, solidarity and family, instead of lives shackled to the economy and the markets.

The share of social expenditure in total public expenditure thus rose from 60.9% to 75.5% between 2004 and 2013. During this period, the unemployment rate remained at about 7%, the national poverty rate was reduced from 18% to 9.7% and the minimum wage was raised from 4,800 pesos to 10,000 pesos (average annual inflation rate of 7%).

It also supported the strengthening of trade unions. According to the International Trade Union Confederation, Uruguay became the most advanced country in the Americas in terms of respect for "fundamental labor rights, in particular freedom of association, the right to collective bargaining and the right to strike".

"You have inspired millions of people, encouraging them to do their bit for a better world."

Thank you and Rest In Power !

[ckret2]

weird question: are you the time traveled reincarnation of alex hirsch?

probably not because if i was alex hirsch i probably wouldn't be making posts about Bill's fetishes

[wildsaltair]

me: to really understand the tragedy Maximus bears throughout Gladiator, we have to take into account the fact that his entire worldview is based on the idea that Marcus Aurelius was a good man and that everything Maximus had done up until that point was in the service of an empire whose values he could trust and support. I would even argue that, excluding the loss of his wife and son, the greatest loss Maximus has to grapple with is the loss of his unswerving belief in the goodness of Rome. once he sees its corruption and becomes its victim, he has to reevaluate everything he's ever done and believed in, which affects not only his desire to free Rome from tyranny but also—

the burglar who broke into my house: his guilt about his role in the fate of Rome and his service to a man who was indirectly the cause of all this corruption?

me: exactly. now,

[winchesterian]

tumblr never beating the we have never talked to a queer person over 30 allegations

[yutastoria]

yutahisu to the bridge of me and ur mama by childish gambino where he goes u really got a hold on me, so this isn't just puppy love...LET ME COOK

[the-healing-mindset]

It's easy to look back and wish that you had not been a certain way or done a certain thing, but each of those versions set the stage for who you are and what you have now. Give all your previous selves grace for placing you where you are now, and for where you are going.

[scklbz]

Opinion | Lessons from Alexandria: A Cautionary Tale for Modern American Politics

By Jet Espinosa In a city once hailed as a beacon of knowledge and tolerance, Alexandria drew people from across the ancient world. It was a place where scholars, thinkers, and believers from diverse backgrounds came to share and preserve their wisdom. With libraries that housed invaluable knowledge in science, philosophy, medicine, and the arts, Alexandria was a symbol of progress and…

[lightsandfire]

25-11-2023, part one:

I got my first whole fleece! It's from a Walliser Schwarznase (Walliser Blacknose). I already got rid of all the dirty and matted parts (pictured is the whole fleece before cleaning), and I took the very dirty edges off to do an experiment on cleaning.

The length of the fibers is +- 10 cm and the locks are very soft. There is quite a bit of vegetable matter, but I think that's to be expected. Look at those curls though! So pretty! I'm thinking about keeping some locks to use as texture while spinning.

Currently I'm scouring some of the dirty sides in warm water and dish soap, to see if they can be used for a test spin. A lot of brown water has been discarded already, so it looks to be cleaning up nicely. I hope it won't mat :)

The rest of the fleece has been rolled up in an old blanket and stored for now, untill the test spin has been done.

Now I have to see if I can borrow a carder from someone (or hand cards), so I can try to spin some up! (Once it is clean and dry, that is). Goal will probably be to spin a sweather out of this.

Updates wil follow in the next days/weeks! I'm very excited :D

(Part two)

[grandwitchbird]

Seen a bit about ‘hysteria’ in Nosferatu (2024) but nothing really digging into what the film is doing with neuroticism. Let’s get Jungian. Spoilers and musings below the cut.

The central tragedy here isn’t that Orlok is a monster who cannot love or young lovers forever divided. The tragedy is love with the disturbing heart of passion cut out of it and passion that can only be fully embraced in death. The world itself is broken in a way we see reflected in the characters.

Ellen pursues. She calls out to the world with such a hunger that an ancient undead monster hears her and is irresistibly drawn in. She pursues Thomas. She initiates their sexual relations and begs for his attention and craves his company. He’s an acceptable outlet for her desires and the promise of a normal life, not just the man she loves. Orlok is the hunger itself. The cruelty of her dilemma rests in the fact that Thomas loves Ellen but is incapable of satiating her or even recognizing her desires, and Orlok is nothing but appetite and incapable of love. Ellen is love and desire, both embraced with ferocity and both rejected by the world. But she will not be denied or divided in herself. I’m paraphrasing loosely from memory, but it’s key that she tells von Franz that she’s never done any wrong, only lived in accordance with her nature.

Neurosis is social and cultural in this context. It’s embedded in the patriarchal domesticating interests of the setting. Thomas is nearly repression itself through no real fault of his own. He’s a husband. A decent man. In his figure we see the safe boundaries that hem in the potentially dangerous desires represented in Ellen and Orlok. He’s delighted to have “such a dirty wife” but shrinks from the real face of her desires. Thomas loves Ellen, but he retreats and denies and treats her libidinal qualities as ‘dirty’ and flawed aspects that must be repressed and avoided and sublimated. For all Ellen’s seizing and moaning and ‘hysterics’, Thomas is also neurotic in his retreat from the libidinal.

All passion is a challenge to fate, and what it does cannot be undone. Fear of fate is a very understandable phenomenon, for it is incalculable, immeasurable, full of unknown dangers. The perpetual hesitation of the neurotic to launch out into life is readily explained by his desire to stand aside so as not to get involved in the dangerous struggle for existence. But anyone who refuses to experience life must stifle his desire to live—in other words, he must commit partial suicide. This explains the death-fantasies that usually accompany the renunciation of desire. - Jung Vol. 5

We shouldn’t make the mistake of reducing the libidinal here to purely sex. Rather the libidinal is the all encompassing, messy pursuit of life: it’s the passion that drives creation, the desire for meaning, the wholehearted engagement with the entire range of human experience. Likewise the death drive exists here, but the desire for annihilation is simply the inherent negative to the libidinal positive. Hysteria or madness is the overwhelming outpouring of thwarted passion. It’s an attempt to live. Thomas’s repressed neuroticism is antithetical to the way Ellen moves and exists within the world but no less neurotic for that. His genteel repression and devotion to hierarchies are both attempts to live within a world that demands repression of the negative and retreats from passion that make him specifically ill-equipped to grapple with true darkness. The same darkness that Ellen is more than a match for.

And this is where we see clearly that these characters belong to two different realms that slowly converge over the course of the film. Ellen is trapped in a realm that has no space for her desires and so she is left to dream of death. Thomas hesitates until he falls from a literal ledge in a very literal partial suicide (poignantly still accidental to some degree: he must slip to take the leap). That he is revived by the church itself, a kind of resurrection by that ultimate domesticating force, highlights his distance from the realm occupied by Orlok and Ellen. His attempts to “launch out into the world” are to be as frustrated as Ellen’s in their own way. The world is already broken and must be remade. He is built for that other, more domesticated world, no matter how much he loves Ellen.

The power of God is menaced by the seductions of passion; heaven is threatened with a second fall of angels. If we translate this projection back into the psychological sphere from whence it came, it would mean that the good and rational Power which rules the world with wise laws is threatened by the chaotic, primitive force of passion. Therefore passion must be exterminated, which means, in mythological projection, that the race of Cain and the whole sinful world must be wiped out, root and branch, by the Flood. That is the inevitable result of a passion that sweeps away all barriers. […] As a power which transcends consciousness the libido is by nature daemonic: it is both God and devil. If evil were to be utterly destroyed, everything daemonic, including God himself, would suffer a grievous loss; it would be like performing an amputation on the body of the Deity. - Jung Vol. 5

What we see in Nosferatu is the fragments of what’s left behind when the libidinal drive is thwarted and abjected. We see divine amputations. We see it in the decent men who try to fight back a darkness they can’t understand or truly combat because they’ve cut it off and cast it out from themselves. We see it in Orlok, all the cast-off desires of the world reduced to pure destructive appetite. And in Ellen we see the cost of the abjection, in her passion reduced to ‘hysteria’. But only in Ellen does passion show its true and whole face in all its courage and devotion and madness.

So Ellen must die. She must die with Orlok because this world has already disfigured the divine body by rejecting and repressing that most fundamental of drives. But the repressed always returns, and it is always hungry. So Ellen plays the priestess. Unlike Orlok who has rejected death and thus impoverishes his desires into sadistic appetite, Ellen embraces her nature and her desires and death. No hesitation or halfway measures. She remains wholly and truly herself as she becomes the flood, a sacrament, a blood sacrifice, that wipes out the “chaotic and primitive forces of passion” leaving the world itself the poorer, if safer, for it.

Notes:

Ellen has “too much blood” both practically so she can play her role and metaphorically so that she can embody every nuance of the libidinal drive. Blood is life.

The virgin and the stallion, potent symbols of life, can locate a vampire.

Iron kills the undead (as it does fae and other undomesticated relics) because it is the symbol of man made power over the earth itself.

The blood sacrifice is also the marriage bed.

I could keep going, but you get it. The film is really consistent with all of this.

I won’t pretend to be particularly invested in what Jung intended with his framework. His intents are far less interesting than the artistic interpretations that give us films like Nosferatu. He certainly thought the soul was hermaphrodite, and we see that clearly in Eggers’s work here (particularly in the Wuthering Heights influence on our central romance/s).

[howtostartarevolution]

The most meaningful words

Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité

All men are created equal.

Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar.

There are surely more statements that summarize this thought that all people are in the end equal in worth. That they are humans and should be treated as humans. All the same. With some undeniable human rights. 

It has been more than 200 years some of these ideas have been put to paper. Some of them are only as young as the end of WWII. But they show that this idea has manifested in peoples minds and hearts.

And yes in it you can also find the true spirit of some christian teachings of viewing your fellow humans as your neighbors, someone you have an undeniable connection and a responsibility to treat as you want to be treated yourself.

It is if you want as old as humanity itself. Stuck in our minds and hearts from a time when indeed we were all neighbors in our little or further communities.

Because we are at our core in biology and evolution a communal species. That thrives and suffers together. 

Yet over thousands of years there has been the competing ideology that „Some people are better than others.“

I do not want to delve into the question why or where its origin lies. But the fact remains that todays world is shaped by the competing ideas of „Everyone same in worth“ and „Some people better than others.“

At the time of Enlightenment 200 years ago when Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité and All men are created equal. were written down, it very much was a world of „Some people are better than others“. It permeated societies resulting in things like the feudal system, people neatly ordered into „good, better, best“ with the monarch at the top as the ultimate „best“. And yet it was also a time where the order of things were questioned. Where it became more than apparent that the monarch is surely not „the best“ and „the worst“ was at least worth as much as everyone else.

So the idea of everyone being equal found its way into peoples hearts and minds again and took root anew and bore fruit, and so these declarations were written.

It does not matter who people at the time saw as included in the „All“ or for whom to give „Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité“, because it is not specified in the words finding their way to the paper.

It is an idea written down. An ideal. 

It does not need to reflect the true state of things.

Except that it does.

Ever since.

It is the purest of ideals as ideals should be, not as something that is, but as something that is meant to be achieved. The blueprint reality has to be held up to, compared to and evaluated to.

Are we already in a world where this ideal has been achieved? No? Then keep working.

And this, this single ideal, idea, concept has shaped our world the past 200 years. The past 200 years this idea has battled against the prevailing concept of „Some people are better than others“. The past 200 years fights have been won. Fights have been lost. But bit by bit, decade by decade we have inched closer and closer to fit our world to the ideal.

More people have freedom. More people have rights. Less people killed. More people saved. More humane punishments. More diplomatic agreements. A mindset that is more peaceful than it has been in the past.

For 200 years there has been social change to fit our world to that ideal of „All humans are equal in worth.“ Slowly, step by step but always progressing.

200 years is just a blip in human evolution. Even social evolution. There are ups and downs, steps forwards and steps back, but it’s undeniable progress. Progress away from putting humans into categories of „better and worse“ and towards filling just one category „human“. 

And such the feather, the word, has indeed become mightier than any sword. You can not kill ideas.

200 years is just a blip in human time. So do not expect the world to match the ideal yet. It won’t. It will disappoint you. It will make you miss the progress that has been achieved. 

We are still battling the idea of „some people better“, maybe we always will. But we are making progress. We are succeeding. We are winning step by step. Even when the world looks dark and progress seems to revert, it is just a slowing and not a halt.

For the ideal of „everyone being the same in worth“ is humanity itself. It is rooted in the very core of our biology and evolution. It is planted in our hearts and our minds. And even if it withers down and falls dormant for a time. It will sprout again and again like the most loathsome, most awesome weed.

That is the true meaning and true legacy of the words

Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité

All men are created equal.

Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar.

[philosophybits]

On the way from mythology to logistics thought has lost the element of self-reflection and today machinery disables men even as it nurtures them.

Max Horkheimer & Theodor W. Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment

[denkilightning]

ftm jay who first comes out to ras because he knows ras has done 7000 worse things to care

jay: i am not a woman.

ras: ..... alright. what do you wish to be called?

jay: captain.

ras: .... i meant gender-wise.

jay: the fucks a gennderwhize.

ras: ..... i see. if thats okay, we shall settle with he/him for you. and burn all previous records of you.

jay: sounds fun.

ras: would you like to change your name as well?

jay: no.

ras: ....... okay

[a-typical]

“Books permit us to voyage through time, to tap the wisdom of our ancestors. The library connects us with the insight and knowledge, painfully extracted from Nature, of the greatest minds that ever were, with the best teachers, drawn from the entire planet and from all our history, to instruct us without tiring, and to inspire us to make our own contribution to the collective knowledge of the human species. I think the health of our civilization, the depth of our awareness about the underpinnings of our culture and our concern for the future can all be tested by how well we support our libraries.” ― Carl Sagan, Cosmos

[yutastoria]

this also a wip, yutahisu priest x demon au hehehehehehehehehe, heavily referenced that one clip from diablo 4 where lilith is summoned