lostmementomemori · 11 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Australian soldiers enjoy a moment together after being liberated from a Japanese concentration camp (1945)
130 notes · View notes
sher-ee · 6 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
123 notes · View notes
queerism1969 · 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
139 notes · View notes
gryficowa · 7 days ago
Text
Isn't it interesting that the US preferred to bomb Hiroshima rather than save people from Poland and concentration camps? I don't know, it just speaks volumes to me, especially in the context of what is happening in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and Syria…
It's just that, as usual, the USA is on the right side and, as usual, doing whatever it takes to end the genocide… While taking part in the genocide…
21 notes · View notes
gbakr · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Wm F. Buckley vs. Elmo Musk
31 notes · View notes
docprof · 19 days ago
Text
Mene mene tekel upharsin. … Part 3
Tumblr media
Mene mene tekel upharsin. … Part 3
As it has turned out (and contrary to the fantastical western narratives of Russian humiliation and massive losses), the Russians have prosecuted a remarkably economical destruction of not one, but five successive iterations of increasingly NATO-armed and NATO-trained armies.
And they have done so while assembling, equipping, and thoroughly training a reserve army twice the size of the one they have used to methodically wreck the armies arrayed against them in Ukraine.
They have achieved the greatest industrial mobilization since the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. Their massive increases in production of the implements of industrial-scale warfare dwarves the combined capabilities of their adversaries.
To Be continued.....
21 notes · View notes
secular-jew · 6 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
This guy texts me, breaks his own rules ("kikes to not interact") and thinks I'm going to entertain a conversation with him.
47 notes · View notes
blasphemister · 3 months ago
Text
youtube
Arnold Schwarzenegger makes a noble effort here.
22 notes · View notes
chillinaris · 3 months ago
Text
GAZA SEBELUM dan SETELAH GENOSIDA ISRAEL
Tumblr media
25 notes · View notes
my-midlife-crisis · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
31 notes · View notes
geezerwench · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
It's that simple. Pick a torch, America.
.
.
.
.
.
.
#VoteBlueToSaveAmerica #VoteBlueToSaveLives #VoteBlue #PickATorch #PickATorchAmerica
31 notes · View notes
lostmementomemori · 10 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
An 18-year-old Russian girl during the liberation of the concentration camp she had been a prisoner in. (Dachau, 1945)
103 notes · View notes
dronescapesvideos · 4 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Blohm und Voss BV 141 Asymmetrical Design Prototype. Germany, 1938.
➤GERMAN AIRCRAFT VIDEOS: https://dronescapes.video/WWIIGermany
➤HD IMAGE: https://dronescapes.video/Bv141
10 notes · View notes
maeinthekinning · 5 months ago
Text
Sometimes i will see people say stuff (can be tiktok, tumblr, twitter, youtube or even offline ill see) that all i can think is if the nazis overheard you they would be so grateful cause YOU ARE DOING THEIR WORK FOR THEM
What do i mean by that?
"White people learning spanish is cultural appropriation" spain is right next to france even...and making sure people can't learn languages...
"If you use a satin bonnet as a white person you are a culture vulture" first off, white people can have naturally curly hair. Second off, it can benefit even straight hair. More using it lowers price. Making it exclusive to only black people provides another way for nazis to other
The thing is also, cultural appreciation as a concept is sorely lacking in a lot of people that claim to care about cultural exploitation/appropriation. And the thing is, nazis want that.
22 notes · View notes
nicklloydnow · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
“Nietzsche attacked idealist morality. He ridiculed kindness and pity, revealed the pretense and unmanliness hidden in humanitarian sentimentalty. Like Proudhon and Marx he insisted on the beneficial side of war. Quite distant from the political parties of his time, he happened to set forth principles for an aristocracy of "masters of the world." He praised beauty and physical force, had a distinct preference for life's risky, turbulent aspects. These straightforward value judgments, distinct from liberal idealism, made the Fascists claim him as one of theirs, led certain anti-Fascists to see him as a Hitler predecessor.
As Nietzsche realized, the near future would see the exceeding of conventional limits opposed to violence and the clashing of real forces in conflicts of outsize proportions, clashes that would violently and materially bring all existing values into question. He pictured the woes of a wartime period that would be of unprecedented harshness, and he didn't believe we should avoid such miseries regardless of cost or that those trials would surpass human strength. To him even catastrophes like this seemed preferable to stagnation, to the lies of bourgeois life, to the banal happiness preached by a herd of professors of morality. In principle, he posed the question of whether authentic value exists for humankind, whether prescriptions of conventional morality and traditional idealism obstruct the coming of that value, and whether life will overturn conventional morality. The Marxists similarly understand moral prejudices—understanding them as opposed to revolutionary violence and yielding to some sort of preeminent value (the emancipation of the proletariate). Though different from Marxism's value, the value proclaimed by Nietzsche isn't less universal—since the emancipation he wanted wasn't that of a single class relative to others but the freeing of human life under the example of its best representatives—compared to the moral slavery of the past. Nietzsche dreamed of a humanness that, far from fleeing its tragic fate, would love and embrace this fate to the fullest, a humanness that would no longer lie to itself and would raise itself above the social slavishness.
This sort of humankind differs from the present-day kind, which is normally confused with a function that's only part of human possibility. Putting it succinctly, this new humanness would be integrally human and freed from the slavery that limits us. Nietzsche had no desire to define such a free and sovereign humankind, halfway between modern humanity and a super-humanity, that is, superman. Appropriately, he thought when something is free, you can't define it. Could anything be more vain than designating or limiting a thing that doesn't yet exist? It's up to us to will it! To will the future is to recognize the known as to be surpassed. With this principle—a primacy of the future over the past to which he remained loyal—Nietzsche becomes as disconnected as possible from what is despised by life under the name of death, or by dreams under the name of reaction. Between the ideas of Fascist reactionaries and Nietzsche's notions there is more than simple difference—there's radical incompatibility. While declining to limit the future, which has all rights according to him, Nietzsche all the same suggested it through vague and contradictory suggestions. Which led to confusions and misunderstandings. It's wrongheaded to attribute definite intentions to him regarding electoral politics, arguing that he talked of "masters of the world." What he intended was a risked evocation of possibility. As for the sovereign humanity whose brilliance he wanted to shine forth: in contradictory ways he saw the new humankind sometimes as wealthy, sometimes as poorer than the workers, sometimes as powerful, sometimes as tracked down by enemies. He required of the new humankind that it possess a capacity to withstand adversity—while recognizing its right to trample on norms. Still, he distinguished this humanity on principle from men in possession of power. He recognized no limits, and confined himself to describing as freely as he could the field of a possible.
This said, if "Nietzscheanism" has to be defined, there isn't much reason to dwell on the part of this doctrine that assigns all rights to life as opposed to idealism. A rejection of classical morality is common to Marxism, Nietzscheanism, and National Socialism. The only essential is the value in whose name life asserts these higher rights. Once this principle of judgment is established, Nietzschean values are seen as opposing racist values within a context of the whole.
—Nietzsche's initial stance develops out of admiration for the Greeks, the most intellectually developed people of all time. In Nietzsche's mind everything is subordinated to culture. While in the Third Reich, a reduced culture has only military might as its end.
—One of the most significant traits of Nietzsche's work is its glorification of Dionysian values, that is, infinite intoxication and enthusiasm. It's no coincidence that Rosenburg's Myth in the Twentieth Century denounces the cult of Dionysus as non-Aryan! . . . Despite hastily repressed inclinations, racism admits only military values. "Youth needs stadiums, not sacred groves," asserts Hitler.
—I already talked about the opposition of the past to the future. Strangely enough, Nietzsche designates himself as a child of the future. He himself linked the phrase with the fact of his not having a native land. And actually, our native country is what belongs to the past in us. It's on this and this alone that Hitlerism erects its rigid value system, adding no new value. Nothing could be more alien to Nietzsche, who—against the world—asserts the total vulgarity of the Germans.
—Two official precursors of National Socialism prior to Chamberlain were Nietzsche's contemporaries, Wagner and Lagarde. Nietzsche is appreciated and has been pushed to the forefront in the propaganda effort, but the Third Reich doesn't consider him one of its teachers in the same way it eventually does the other two. Nietzsche was a friend to Richard Wagner but broke off, disgusted by his Francophobic and anti-Semitic chauvinism. As for the pan-Germanist Paul de Lagarde, a single text removes any doubts on that score. "If you only knew," Nietzsche wrote Theodor Fritsch, "how I laughed last spring reading works by a self-important, stubborn sentimentalist by the name of Paul de Lagarde . . .”
—Today of course we're aware how anti-Semitic stupidity functions in Hitlerite racism. There's nothing more essential to Hitlerism than hating Jews. Opposing this is the following rule of conduct of Nietzsche's: "No friendship with anyone implicated in this barefaced hoax of races." Nietzsche asserted nothing more wholeheartedly than his loathing of anti-Semites.
I have to insist on this last point. Nietzsche's fate was to be tarred with the Nazi brush. Certain hypocricies have to be dealt with for that reason. One was perpetrated by the philosopher's own sister who survived him and lived on till very recently (she died in 1935). When November 2, 1933, arrived, Mrs. Elizabeth Foerster, born Nietzsche, could still recall the difficulties that arose between her and her brother—difficulties stemming from her 1885 marriage to the anti-Semite Bernard Foerster.
A letter in which Nietzsche reminds her of his disgust (he refers to it as being as pronounced as possible) for the man whom she chose to be her husband (he calls him by name) was published through her efforts. November 2, 1933, in the house where Nietzsche died, Mrs. Elizabeth Judas-Foerster received Adolf Hitler, Fuhrer of the Third Reich. On that solemn occasion she attested to the family's anti-Semitism by reading a text by . . . Bernard Foerster!
"Before leaving Weimar to go to Essen," reported the Times on November 4, 1933, "Chancellor Hitler paid a visit to Mrs. Elizabeth Foerster-Nietzsche, the sister of the celebrated philosopher. The elderly lady made him a gift of a walking stick once belonging to her brother. She invited him to visit the Nietzsche Archives.
"Mr. Hitler listened to her read from a memorandum addressed to Bismarck in 1879 by Dr. Foerster, the anti-Semitic agitator who protested against the incursions of the Jewish spirit in Germany. Taking Nietzsche's walking stick in hand, Mr. Hitler strode through the crowd to great huzzahs."
In 1887, addressing a contemptuous letter to anti-Semite Theodor Fritsch, Nietzsche ended this way, "So then really, what do you think I feel when the name of Zarathustra issues forth from the mouths of anti-Semites?"“ - Georges Bataille, ‘On Nietzsche’ (1945) [p. 169 - 173]
14 notes · View notes
defiantart · 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
24 notes · View notes