#horizontal scaling

[goodoldbandit]

Data Unbound: Embracing NoSQL & NewSQL for the Real-Time Era.

Sanjay Kumar Mohindroo Sanjay Kumar Mohindroo. skm.stayingalive.in Explore how NoSQL and NewSQL databases revolutionize data management by handling unstructured data, supporting distributed architectures, and enabling real-time analytics. In today’s digital-first landscape, businesses and institutions are under mounting pressure to process massive volumes of data with greater speed,…

[techman1010]

Vertical Scaling and Horizontal Scaling: Benefits and Differences

As businesses grow and their demand for computing resources increases, ensuring their IT infrastructure can scale effectively becomes crucial. Two common approaches to scaling systems are vertical scaling and horizontal scaling. Both have their unique benefits and are suited for different types of workloads and growth patterns. Understanding the differences and the advantages of each can help businesses make informed decisions about optimizing their infrastructure.

Vertical Scaling (Scaling Up)

Vertical scaling, also known as scaling up, involves increasing the capacity of a single machine by adding more resources, such as CPU, RAM, or storage. Essentially, you are making one server more powerful to handle larger workloads.

Benefits of Vertical Scaling

Simplicity in Management Vertical scaling is easier to manage since there is only one machine or a small number of machines to configure and maintain. This reduces complexity and simplifies monitoring, updates, and maintenance tasks. As all data and processes remain on one server, managing and troubleshooting are straightforward.

Faster Implementation Upgrading an existing server with more resources like memory or processing power can be done relatively quickly. You don't need to redesign or redistribute applications across multiple servers, making vertical scaling a faster option when an immediate performance boost is required.

No Changes in Application Architecture In vertical scaling, the underlying application architecture remains unchanged. Since everything stays on a single machine, developers and system administrators do not need to make major changes to the application to handle more traffic or processing power. This makes it easier to upgrade without disrupting operations.

Cost-Efficient for Small to Medium Workloads For smaller applications or workloads, vertical scaling can be more cost-effective. Instead of investing in multiple machines, companies can maximize the potential of a single, powerful server to meet their needs.

Horizontal Scaling (Scaling Out)

Horizontal scaling, or scaling out, involves adding more machines (servers or nodes) to a system to distribute the load. Rather than making one machine more powerful, horizontal scaling allows businesses to spread workloads across multiple systems, which can be added as needed.

Benefits of Horizontal Scaling

Increased Fault Tolerance One of the major benefits of horizontal scaling is its fault tolerance. Since workloads are distributed across multiple servers, the failure of a single machine is less likely to disrupt the entire system. The system can continue to function with minimal downtime, as other servers pick up the slack.

Unlimited Scalability Unlike vertical scaling, which is limited by the physical constraints of a single machine, horizontal scaling offers virtually unlimited scalability. New machines can be added as demand grows, allowing businesses to scale infinitely in response to increasing workloads.

Cost-Effective for Large-Scale Operations For large-scale applications or enterprises handling significant traffic, horizontal scaling is often more cost-effective. Rather than investing in a high-cost, ultra-powerful server, companies can deploy several low-cost servers to handle workloads in parallel. Additionally, with cloud solutions, it’s possible to pay only for the resources used.

Improved Performance with Load Balancing Horizontal scaling often comes with load balancing mechanisms that ensure traffic is evenly distributed across multiple machines. This leads to improved performance, as no single server is overloaded. Applications can handle more users, traffic, or data processing tasks without bottlenecks.

Better Adaptation to Cloud Environments Horizontal scaling fits seamlessly with cloud environments and microservices architectures. Cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud offer services that allow easy scaling out by provisioning new virtual machines on demand. This ensures businesses can scale quickly and dynamically according to real-time needs.

Vertical Scaling vs. Horizontal Scaling: Key Differences

Scalability Limitations Vertical scaling is limited by the maximum capacity of a single machine. Once the server reaches its physical limitations, you can no longer scale up. Horizontal scaling, on the other hand, allows you to keep adding machines, making it more suitable for long-term scalability.

Cost Structure Vertical scaling often involves upgrading to more powerful (and more expensive) hardware. This can lead to high upfront costs. Horizontal scaling distributes costs more evenly, allowing companies to pay for additional servers as they grow.

Performance While vertical scaling can deliver immediate performance improvements, it may become inefficient for handling large-scale, distributed workloads. Horizontal scaling distributes the load, improving performance without over-relying on a single machine.

Application Architecture Vertical scaling usually does not require significant changes to application architecture, while horizontal scaling often requires a more distributed approach. Applications must be designed to run across multiple servers or nodes in a horizontally scaled environment.

Choosing the Right Approach

When deciding between vertical and horizontal scaling, consider the size and growth potential of your business, as well as your application's architecture. For small-scale applications or those that don’t require frequent scaling, vertical scaling might be more practical. However, for businesses expecting rapid growth or handling large amounts of traffic, horizontal scaling provides a more scalable, resilient, and cost-effective solution.

Conclusion

Both vertical and horizontal scaling have their advantages depending on the specific needs of your business. Vertical scaling offers simplicity and quick upgrades, while horizontal scaling provides better long-term scalability and fault tolerance. The key is to assess your current and future needs, ensuring that your infrastructure can grow alongside your business.

[marrywillson]

Cuneiform are leading product scaling services Provider Company in USA. Scaling products permits firms to satisfy increasing customer demand, enter new markets, and optimize income possibilities.

[vehemourn]

born wicked

[keeps-ache]

buttons i've made !! :D

[tree-forg]

I am very enraged right now at the world for not realizing that FISH HAVE VERTICAL FINS. YOUR MERMAIDS MUST HAVE VERTICAL FINS TO BE PROPER FISH-PEOPLE. AGHHHHGGH YOU'RE DRAWING MARINE MAMMALS WITH FISH SCALES AND FIN TYPES. FUCK YOUUUUU THATS NOT HOW FISH WORK. AGAGAHGAHAHHHHHH.

[itsgerges]

Best Regards The Space Is Created By Light Motion With Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second (Revised) https://app.box.com/s/9o6uauipdaj41j9b1jbj349abuuidnh9 or https://app.box.com/s/nhno1uf832c8kpwx06pk7kt909mgt3aq or https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/253332.html

NOTICE The revised version is typical the original paper with one difference- I have improved the paper argument proves and added more proves for it Paper Argument My 1st theory tells -the solar system space is created by one energy and this energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed 1.16 million km per second- the light created all orbits before any planet creation- means- the solar system space is similar as one building has 8 stories and the designer built all stories before any one live in them- By that the orbits are created depending on each other (as proved by my planet orbital distance equation) and no planet data has effect on the orbit creation- because the orbits are built before any planet creation- the light created all orbits except Neptune orbit- the paper explains the reason The Major feature is (Space creation needs a motion by speed 1.16 mkm per sec) – this is the fact the theory proves- this fact proof produces 2 important results (1st result) it proves the speed 1.16 million km per second is A Fact – and proves there's a light beam moves by speed 1.16 million km per second (2nd result) it gives us an answer for the question (how is the space created?) and also it helps us to discover the space nature and features

The Planets Orbits Creation Details The light beam with speed 1.16 million km per second built the solar system starting its motion from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit- the light created the planets orbits before any planet creation-the orbits are created based on each other- after the light created all orbits and reach to Pluto orbit- the light energy is consumed in the space creation- and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is (300000 km/s = the known speed of light)- we understand this is one light beam its speed was 1.16 million km per second in Mercury orbit before the space creation- and its speed be 300000 km/s in Pluto orbit after the space creation as a result for the consumption of the energy in the space creation- In Pluto orbit- The light had NO energy to build any more orbits –because- any additional space creation will consume more energy and that will decrease the light speed to be less than 300000 km/s (the known speed of light) – and – No known light moves by speed less than 300000 km/s – means- If the speed is decreased to be less than 300000 km/s (the known speed of light) that would change the light beam energy nature into another type of energy which means the light beam will be perished for that the light couldn't create any more orbits and the light had to return to its origin point (Mercury orbit) passing through all built orbits- this motion didn't cost any energy because the orbits are created already- this analysis tells us- the light with known speed 300000 km/s can NOT create any space and the space creation needs the speed 1.16 million km per sec

Paper Argument Proof The light beam with speed 1.16 million km per second didn't create Neptune orbit – because Neptune original orbit was Pluto current orbit (5906 mkm)-Pluto had collided with Neptune and pushed Neptune out of its orbit- understandable – Pluto could NOT push Neptune out of its orbit because Neptune Mass is 7000 times Pluto Mass- but Pluto was carrying by very strong wave of energy and the wave pushed Neptune out of its orbit- it's similar to a small boat is carrying by strong wave of water and the wave pushed a great ship from its place and enabled the small boat to occupy this ship place- this story details is written in item No. (XI) The important news here is- Because Neptune had to leave its original orbit 5906 mkm- Neptune had to create a new orbit for itself (4495 mkm)- but no longer light beam its speed 1.16 mkm per second is found because the energy is consumed already as explained before- so- How can Neptune build its new orbit (4495 mkm)? Neptune used Jupiter motion in place of the light beam motion to build the orbit- because – Jupiter moves– in 24.6 h (Mars rotation period) a distance= 1.16 million km Shortly- there's a rate of time tells (one second of the light clock =24.6 hours of Jupiter clock) for that Jupiter motion can be used in place of the motion of the light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second- That's why I use Neptune orbit analysis as a proof for my theory tells (the planets orbits are created by the energy of light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second) Shortly– The speed 1.16 million km per second is The Necessary Requirement For The Space Creation- for that- the space is created by light motion with speed 1.16 million km per second and when this light beam with speed 1.16 million km per second is no longer found and it was necessary to use alternative player to create the space- the process used Jupiter motion as alternative to the light beam motion because Jupiter moves 1.16 million km per 24.6 hours- means- Jupiter motion velocity can be equivalent to the speed of light 1.16 million km per second- Here Neptune orbit provides a decisive proof for the theory- in fact- the data proves decisively that (the space can be created Only by a motion with speed1.16 mkm/s)

NOTICE Please note– Jupiter didn't provide the energy to build Neptune orbit- the energy is provided by Pluto- means-Neptune captured the energy from Pluto and stored it inside its orbit (this fact will be explained later)–the idea is- while the energy was available Neptune could Not Create its orbit because the space creation technical process needs the speed 1.16 million km per second- that's why Neptune had to use Jupiter motion to build the orbit - means without Jupiter motion the orbit can Not be created even if the required energy is available because the space creation technical process needs the speed 1.16 million km per second- we know the energy is provided by Pluto because Neptune orbit is created reflected on the other planets orbits- this fact is used as a proof for the theory and will be explained in details with the argument proof The Argument Proof Credibility The paper provides many deceive proves for the fact tells (The Space Creation Needs A Motion By Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second) – in following I refer to seven proves only 1st Proof The first proof is a table of data proves the light motion by speed 1.16 million km per second is the method by which all planets orbits are created- this motion created the planets orbits depending on each other- that proves one motion only caused to create all planets obits because the orbits are created depending on each other- (this fact is proved also by my planet orbital distance equation) This table is very important one because it shows the planets orbits are created depending on each other by using one motion by speed 1.16 million km per sec- means each orbit is created depending on this same speed ALSO The table also produces periods of time- let's define these periods- (for the inner planets)- each planet orbit produces the period of its previous neighbor- and -(for the outer planets)– each planet orbit produces its own orbital period- that explains why (Planet orbit defines its velocity–as Kepler stated)- because the orbit creation includes the definition of the revolution period of time- and by that- this planet velocity is defined also with the orbit creation

2nd Proof – Neptune Distances Table In this table I compare between Jupiter and Neptune distances- because- Jupiter orbit and its distances with all planets are created by a motion with speed 1.16 million km per sec–But Neptune orbit and its distances with all planets are created by a motion typical to the motion created Jupiter distances but in Neptune distances the used speed is 1.1318 mkm per day (Jupiter velocity per solar day)- that proves the light speed 1.16 mkm/s created Jupiter orbit and distances but Jupiter velocity (1.1318 mkm per day) created Neptune orbit and distances while Jupiter motion depended on a rate of time enabled its velocity it to be equivalent to the speed of light 1.16 mkm per sec These proves are the cornerstone for the theory tells (Space is created by speed 1.16 million km per second) –means- the analysis for any orbit or distance data proves the space is created by a motion with speed 1.16 mkm per sec whether this motion is done by light beam or by a planet- the cornerstone is the speed 1.16 mkm per sec because by this speed the space is created regardless this motion is done by a light beam or a planet- Shortly – The Space creation necessary requirement is the using of a motion by speed 1.16 million km per second (This Conclusion Is Produced Depending On The Data Analysis For All Planets Orbits And Distances In The Solar System) 3rd Proof – Neptune Orbit Is Reflected On The Other Planets Orbits As we have seen all planets orbits are created by light beam motion with speed 1.16 million km per sec and this light moved from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit –and we know this light didn't create Neptune orbit AND Neptune orbit is created by energy moved from Pluto toward Venus-means the energy is sent from Pluto orbit toward Venus orbit by that the energy is sent to Neptune supposing Neptune will send it to Uranus to Saturn to Jupiter till reach to Venus- BUT Neptune had captured the energy inside its orbit and didn't send it to Uranus- and Neptune used this energy to build its orbit- We see clearly the two energies move in the opposite direction to each other- means- Pluto energy moved in the opposite direction to the light beam energy motion For that reason Neptune orbit is created reflected on the other planets orbits- that also tell us (The Space Properties Depends On The Energy Motion Direction By Which This Space Is Created)

But – Why did Pluto send the energy to Venus? This detailed answered is written later but let's refer to a summarized idea only Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy creates waves in the space- means- the space is similar to the sea water – and planet motion is similar to a ship motion in the sea- the ship motion creates waves in the sea- and planet motion creates waves in the space- and each planet waves move by its planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by (47.4 km/s)- All waves move toward Pluto orbit (Perpendicular On The Revolution Direction)- and in Pluto orbit these waves are unified into one unified wave moves by velocity 205.8 km/s (the planets velocities total)- this unified wave is reflected toward Venus orbit This is the energy captured by Neptune and used to build its orbit- this fact is explained in details in my second theory- 4th Proof – Neptune Orbit Violates The Solar System General Rule -we notice, Uranus Orbital Circumference= The Inner Planets Orbital Circumference Total + Jupiter Orbital Circumference + Saturn Orbital Circumference means- The Planet Orbit = The Total Of All Previous Planets Orbits I prove all planets use this same rule except Neptune orbit Means- Neptune orbit violates the planets orbits general rule- which proves Neptune orbit is not created with the other planets orbits

5th Proof – Planet Diameter Table This table proves there's a connection between each planet diameter and its orbit based on the known speed of light 300000 km/s which proves my theory tells (Each Planet Is Created In Its Orbit And From This Orbit Energy)- the table shows Neptune diameter proves Neptune original orbit was 5906 mkm where Pluto diameter proves that Pluto original orbit was NOT 5906 mkm because Pluto diameter is so small for its orbit

6th Proof – Neptune Original Orbit Was 5906 mkm Please note- my theory tells (Planet is created in its orbit and from this orbit energy) for that reason planet creation data is belonged to its orbit- and even if this planet left its orbit- this planet creation data will refer to its original orbit frequently The point is that- Planet is similar to a tree planted in some ground and its orbit is this ground- for that- the planet got its creation data based on its orbit data As a result- Planet creation data refers frequently to this planet original orbit data For example-my planet diameter equation proves planet diameter is created depending on its orbital inclination- for that- Neptune diameter is created depending on 17.2 deg where 17.2 deg is Pluto orbital inclination – that because- Neptune original orbit was 5906 mkm = Pluto current orbit and Neptune is created in this original orbit and Neptune creation data is belonged to this original orbit- for that Neptune diameter equation refers to the inclination 17.2 degrees- the proof provides many other data analysis proves that Neptune is created in this 5906 mkm (Pluto Current Orbit) Which proves the orbit 5906 mkm is Neptune orbital orbit 7th Proof – Neptune Orbit Creation Details Analysis The creation process analysis proves Neptune orbit is created by Jupiter motion while all other orbits are created by the light motion- the orbits and distances analysis proves this fact decisively These proves are discussed in details in item No. (XI) Notice The proves and discussions for my first theory tells (The Space is Created By Light Motion with Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second) is found in Item No. (XI) The Paper Contents The paper provides 8 theories which are (1st Theory) The Solar System Space Is Created Of One Energy Provided By One Light Beam Moves By Speed 1.16 million km per second (explained before) (2nd Theory) The Gravitational Waves Are Created By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field- Moreover There's No Gravitational Field- And The Sun Has No Massive Gravity And No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity (Newton is wrong) Also- The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- the waves reflection cause effects on the planets data and cause to square the wave velocity Shortly The space is similar to the sea of water and any motion energy in space creates waves- based on that- Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy creates waves in the space- and each planet waves move by its planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by (47.4 km/s)- all waves move toward Pluto orbit (Perpendicular On The Revolution Direction)- and in Pluto orbit these waves are unified into one unified wave moves by velocity 205.8 km/s (the planets velocities total)- this unified wave is the gravitational wave- means- the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies total (CONT) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow

E-mail mrwaheid1@yahoo.com gergesgerges@yandex.ru ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous VK https://vk.com/id696655587 Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[ljuerlav]

often susceptible to that human folly that is wanting people who are also part of a thing to at least acknowledge when you spent a bunch of hours working on something thats is for that thing

[tj-crochets]

Re: your tags: OMG yes that mightve been me!! You wrote up an explanation of your fidget triangle pattern at my request and I was so touched and am embarrassed that I still havent made it 😅 but if my username did inspire your bee pattern thats so lovely and I’m honored!! I would also be very interested if you ever made a bunny-bee!!

"Actually i just reread your tags and this was when you were sewing so it might not have been me 🤔 but I have sent asks before so we have interacted at least once!" I just copy-pasted the second ask there, but I think it was you! If I remember correctly, I think I saw your username when you liked one of my posts? I am super tempted to make a bunny-bee! Cholyknight has a sewing pattern for one here and if I had a yellow long pile minky like she used in that example I would totally make one

[solradguy]

It's ok I put the art book on Archive so you don't have to pay us$80 to look at it ^_^ The files were sent to me by ToxicPyro, who gave me the a-ok to upload them to Archive. Shoutout to Toxic 🎉 https://archive.org/details/ggst-digital-artbook

(tho if anyone has the money/means to support the official releases please do—ASW makes merch decisions based on sales so more book sales = more art books)

Guilty Gear XX Λ Core Plus Mission illustration by Daisuke Ishiwatari. From the Guilty Gear Strive Digital Artbook.

[countdown-til-sanders-take-over]

godhood and power is sort of survivorship bias because no weak person could live through revolution. no weak person could become king halfway through a war, crown stained with the blood of their parents and their people. no weak person could leave the throne, walk out of their castle, abandon hundreds of years of history in the hopes of a better future for their people.

in the mountains, among the rocks, feel their energy resonating with you. push through the fear of the gods helping you being those who wish you dead. learn to trust again. pick up your duty, your regalia, hold it tight to your chest. rely on it, steady, steady, steady. there is strength in adapting, you must learn. you must learn that even the toughest rocks erode, and that is ok. embrace the change, leave your kingdom on a quest in the hopes of a better future for your people.

no pressure

[crimethinc]

One year ago today, Aaron Bushnell set himself on fire at the gate of the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC as an act of protest against the ongoing genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

The scale of the tragedy in Gaza exceeds anything we can understand from the United States. Aaron was determined not to passively accept it.

Today, in Aaron's memory, let us pledge ourselves once more to solidarity with Palestinians—to fight against genocide, ethnic cleansing, and all forms of colonialism.

In this memorial, we share Aaron’s summary of his anarchist politics, with testimony from his friends.

https://crimethinc.com/AaronMemories

In Aaron's own words:

"I am an anarchist, which means I believe in the abolition of all hierarchical power structures, especially capitalism and the state… I believe that any hierarchical power structure is bound to reproduce class dynamics and oppression. Thus, I want to engage in egalitarian forms of organizing that produce horizontal power structures based on mutual aid and solidarity."

In the words of one of Aaron's friends,

"Aaron has permanently changed the fabric of your being. You know this because for the rest of your life, you will wrestle with the thought of what you will sacrifice for the liberation of others."

[kedis4ever]

Philadelphia Backyard Idea for a medium-sized transitional porch that has decking and a pergola

[mapstories]

vertical scale

Ocean depths.

[cameronsbabydoll]

what are some habits military!rafe can't get rid of that lowkey icks reader when he extends that attitude at home?

i've heard stories about fathers being more of an unwarranted boss in the house than a daddy to his kids because the way they "care" is by being strict

military!rafe habits that give reader the ick (just a little):

1. “that’s not how we do it.”

reader: folding laundry while watching reality TV

rafe, out of nowhere: “doll, towels go vertical then horizontal—military standard.”

reader: looks at him like he's insane

like sir. this is not a base. this is target brand cotton and my living room.

2. the barking.

he doesn’t mean to—but his voice gets loud fast.

“shoes. off. at the door.”

“babe, c’mon. it’s just the carpet—”

“don’t wanna track nothin’ in. standard.”

the toddler drops their snack? he’s already halfway to the broom like it’s a fire drill.

3. early wakeups.

he’s up at 5 AM and cannot comprehend why the rest of the house isn’t.

coffee brewed, protein shake blended, baby still snoring in their crib—and he’s poking you like,

“babe. it’s nearly sun-up. don’t you wanna seize the day?”

you’re under three blankets like: i wanna seize the pillow.

4. the “no excuses” mentality.

you cry because you're overwhelmed with the baby? tired? hormonal?

he means well, but sometimes he hits you with:

“you think i didn’t wanna quit during boot camp?”

and you’re like sir, i’m asking you to hold the baby while i shower not scale a damn mountain.

5. monitoring EVERYTHING.

you miss a prenatal vitamin once and he’s hovering like:

“what time did you eat? did you drink water? how long was your nap? how’s your iron?”

sweet? yes.

suffocating? also yes.

6. weird food rations.

he’ll meal prep like you’re both on deployment.

everything in tupperware. labeled. protein counted.

you suggest a fun dinner out and he hits you with,

“we already got chicken and rice in the fridge, mama.”

boy if you don’t take me to chili’s—

7. he salutes the baby.

you walk in and he’s full-on saying “at ease, soldier” when the baby burps.

it was cute once. now it’s a bit much.

[parker-artio]

I like to think the Batfamily have nap times. These naptimes do NOT get messed with. If they are on their nap time and there is a full scale Arkham break out- better find out a plan to get them all back in without them.

Most of them probably have it during the day, but others are probably at night or late at the day.

Bruce’s nap time would be at about 10am to 2pm. Either it lasts the whole time, or it starts somewhere in between and ends a bit after 3pm. His nap is very serious. He will not cancel it. He stays up all night and gets maybe 4 hours of sleep at most without his nap.

Dicks nap is always after whenever he gets off work. Which can range from 3pm to 7pm. He tries to nap for three hours, because then he needs to get up and get ready for patrol. 

Jason- I don’t think he’d actually nap on purpose like everyone else. I think he’d just crash whenever.

Cass I feel like is like Jason, she just crashes whenever she feels like it. But she also won’t wait till she’s home, she’ll walk to any horizontal surface and get comfy before she’s out.

Tim either he doesn’t nap for a day. Or he naps all day. If he skips a nap it will be added onto his next nap. His are NOT consistent.

Duke doesn’t nap. He sleeps at night like a banal person. But sometimes he takes a nap after school. One of those naps that you wake up disoriented and still tired, you pants rolled up to your knees, and the marks from how hard you were sleeping.

Damian claims he doesn’t need a nap. But if he isn’t moving around enough when he’s tired during the day he will end up asleep.

Steph never gets enough sleep. She is broke, tired, annoyed, and wants to punch a man. Therefore naps aren’t consistent. She’s a mix of Tim and Cass. She’s crash wherever, whenever, and sometimes not at all.