#lgb drop the tq

[a-room-of-my-own]

A professor of Ethics at Oslo Metropolitan University in Norway has called to legalize AI-generated child pornography, claiming that pedophilia should be seen as an innate sexuality that requires destigmatization.

Ole Martin Moen, a gay man who identifies as “queer,” currently serves as a member of the advisory board on Norway’s Patient Organization for Gender-Incongruence (PKI), a social and political lobby group for trans rights.

[i-cant-really-think-of-a-name]

Reminder if you are a LGB that believes in cutting out the TQ. You are probably a straight person that is confused because if you were LGB you would know your history and how the rhetoric being used against the TQ is the exact same one that was used against LGB now and 20+ years ago. It was the exact same one used for why lesbian and gay people shouldn’t marry, adopt and in the death for the partner.

[autistic-and-radical]

We will never drop the T, sorry

well that's just too bad because there is a whole community of gays, lesbians and bisexuals who dropped the T in their movement

[disillusionedmonster]

Fucking christ. So sick of homophobia from the group that claims to be part of the rainbow community. Imagine saying this with a straight face. Penis in Vagina sex is as straight as it gets and to even hint that it could be lesbian sex is to shit on every single lesbian who has ever lived. People with dicks (men) cannot be lesbians.

How many times do they have to reveal they are homophobic for people to get the memo that it's just a straight pride movement at this point.

[coochiequeens]

June is for the LGB

Stolen from facebook

[bbbhfhjggjf]

Here's how to make TIMs performing in female only sports fair:

Give the second place winner behind the TIM the first place prize, pretend the incel wasn't there to begin with lmao

[corre1310-blog]

ONE OF THE MOST PET PEEVES IN ANY FANDOM IS CREATE CANON CHARACTERS AS T®4ΠΠ¥$!

Can you all (LGBTQ community) STOP ALTERED ANY CHARACTERS WITH CANON GENDER, SEXUALITIES TO YOUR SEXUAL IDENTITY FANTASY

We all sick with transgenders people (except Buck Angel,Blaire White & The Offensive Tr4nn¥) use "ARE YOU ASSUMING MY GENDER?" to get away from problem; ESPECIALLY TRANS WOMEN DOMINATED WOMEN SPORT as cheating method

[anonymously-analyzing-anarchy]

[vintage-bentley]

How in the fuck are you going to be anti trans and a Good Omens fan as if both the book and the show don’t explicitly establish the existence of several nonbinary characters and both Aziraphale and Crowley themselves are genderless beings

Not to mention both David and Michael’s staunch support of the LGBT (really emphasizing the T here, since you love to drop it) community as a whole, and David literally has a trans child

Part of me is even asking this in good faith because how do you see a series that is so incredibly queer and like it considering how much you shit-talk trans people on your lackluster TERF blog

There’s many reasons, actually! I’ll explain them in good faith, because I think that people who ask questions like this don’t understand the perspective of so-called “terfs” and assume we think like you do.

Firstly, I’m a feminist, so I’m used to media not aligning with my politics. I expect it, actually. Down to very simple things, like knowing I’m never going to go into a show and see a woman just existing with body hair like men do in shows all the time. But I’m comfortable and confident enough in my beliefs that I can consume media that doesn’t align with them. This extends to my feelings regarding gender. A they/them character doesn’t make my head explode, it’s just the same for me as seeing a Christian character (like Ella from Netlix’s Lucifer) or a female character who’s pro-beauty culture (like Elinor from First Kill). It’s a representation of a belief I don’t agree with and personally don’t believe in, that’s all.

Secondly, Good Omens is set in a made up universe with fantasy themes. I can easily get behind the idea that the true forms of angels and demons are genderless, because that makes sense to me in the same way God being genderless makes sense to me. This doesn’t have to carry over to me believing that humans can be genderless (I don’t believe in the concept of internal gender identity, because I don’t believe in souls. So I guess the better way to put this is that I don’t believe humans can be sexless unless we’re using gender and sex as synonyms). In the same way that it makes sense to me that angels and demons have souls that are put into bodies issued to them…but I don’t have to believe that also applies to humans. Or how it makes sense to me that Aziraphale and Crowley could survive without food, water, and sleep…but I don’t have to believe that also applies to humans. Etc. etc.

Basically, just because something is in a fantasy show, doesn’t mean I have to believe it’s real.

Thirdly, what the actors do in their own lives is none of my business. I don’t agree with supporting the TQ+ especially in relation to LGB (considering they’ve made it a primary goal to harass lesbians into pretending we can like penis, and to take every chance they get to express their hatred for homosexuality. I love to drop the T because they dropped me and my fellow homosexuals years ago). If two straight male actors want to do that, whatever. I also don’t agree with Sheen having a baby with a woman his daughter’s age, but that hasn’t stopped me from watching the show or appreciating his talent.

This all takes me back to what I said about believing you don’t truly understand the perspective of those you call “terfs”. Just because you might not be able to comprehend watching and enjoying something that doesn’t perfectly align with your worldview, doesn’t mean others feel the same. For example, many radical and rad-leaning feminists enjoyed the Barbie movie, despite it not being radical feminist. We’re capable of watching and enjoying things we don’t agree with, and of having discussions about why we don’t agree with it.

A much simpler answer to your question would be: I’ve always loved angels and demons and all things supernatural. I’ve always loved old cars. I love Queen. Religious/moral commentary and critique interest me. I love lighthearted comedies. I’m gay and starved for representation of healthy gay relationships. I love gay star-crossed lovers stories (go watch First Kill). Naturally, I’m going to love Good Omens, even if it doesn’t perfectly align with my worldview.

[thecoolergrey]

Jesus christ lgb drop the fucking tq you people are insane and have nothing to do with me

Friendly reminder that the entire LGBTQIA2S+ movement exists because of black trans women and that fascists won’t go easy on you just because you’re “one of the good ones” who wants to help strip others of their rights because they’re a little icky in your opinion.

You have your rights because of trans women. Put some respect on their names instead of licking the boots of the people who will kick you in the teeth the moment they’re done doing the same to trans people.

[pineapplerightsideupcake]

just maybe kinda siding with people who want all LGB+T people gone is a bad idea. just saying tho. no matter what we do we are all degenerates in their eyes.

Yeah see I’m getting pretty tired of getting told by straight girls larping as gay men that “we’re all degenerates to the conservatives”

First off, I’m siding with them less than you are. I’m not the one that thinks liking pink and makeup makes you a woman. I’m not the one that thinks being nurturing and soft makes someone a woman.

Second, when you drop the “they/them” when you get a grown up job no one is going to stop you from marrying your Jakey. No one ever has.

Third, the TQ like being seen as degenerate and are trying to drag the LGB, who only want to be normal, down with them.

I need you to understand that the TQ is a weight around the neck of the LGB as we drown. And you have the audacity to say “well we’re all in the water”.

[basilthefolf]

LGB✂️TQ+

Pride was always about the LGB community until about 10-15 years ago when the rest of the alphabet people fully hijacked it and turned it into the abomination you see today. Rational gay & lesbian people are disgusted by what it has become & refuse to take part in it

10% drop in support for LGB relationships can be tied right to the excesses of gender/queer ideology. All our decades long hard work undone by the unworthy. Time to end the forced teaming. LGB✂️TQ+

[autistic-and-radical]

My thoughts on "LGB drop the TQ+"

As a bisexual woman, I fully support the LGB drop the TQ+ movement. Being lesbian, gay and bisexual is rooted in biology. If you're a lesbian, you're a female attracted to other females, if you're gay, you're a male attracted to other males and if you're bisexual then you're attracted to both males and females. And what is TQ+ about? TQ+ is about identity, self-expression and labels. The definitions are loose, too vast and fluid. Nothing is clear, nothing is simple, but everything is offensive. Our generation is so deep in an identity crisis and self-hate that they need a thousand labels and definitions to feel themselves. They don't focus on who they are as a person. In the 80s and 90s when teenagers were figuring out who they are and looking for an identity, they joined subcultures. Also, in that time all gays and lesbians and bisexuals were gender non-conforming and it didn't change their identity. The TQ+ is still growing, teenagers nowadays need labels to feel valid, heard and accepted, but it only confuses them more and instead of helping them find themselves. I know that, because I've been there, done that. A year ago I identified as a fem-aligned non-binary, abrosexual person. Now, when I find the root of my problems and self-hate? I realized that I'm just a bisexual woman. And I feel a lot better like this.

here's a really cool video essay on this topic:

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Rob VL

Published: Jul 27, 2023

Everyone can understand what the first four letters of the commonly-used LGBTQIA+ acronym stand for. The fifth letter, Q, short for queer, remains more nebulous.

What is queer? Is it another word for gay? An alternative for gender non-conforming? A homophobic slur? You’ll get a different definition depending on who you ask. However, that hasn’t stopped leading left-wing charities, organizations, and activists from appending the letter to the acronym, with largely negative consequences.

First, let’s look at the dictionary definition of the word. According to the Oxford dictionary, queer has two definitions: the first being strange or odd; the second, “denoting or relating to a sexual or gender identity that does not correspond to established ideas of sexuality and gender, especially heterosexual norms.” This allows far too much room for interpretation and could even be used to justify the inclusion of both heterosexuals and sexual deviants in the acronym.

If “queer” is simply a different way of saying “not straight”, there is no point in including it in the acronym, as everyone covered under Q would already be covered under L, G, or B. Any gender identification that does not align with a person’s biological sex, including nonbinary and agender identities, falls under T. So what is left for Q?

Some people argue that kink and polyamory fall under Q, because they are non-normative relationship and sexual practices. However, many of the people involved in those practices are heterosexual. Should heterosexuals who are into bondage be lumped into the same “community” as gay men and lesbians, who are visibly discriminated against and have been for decades? I don’t think so.

Abnormal straight relationships are still straight. Straight people of any sort should not be categorized with us just because they get up to weird stuff in the bedroom.

Another category of sexual interests that get labeled as Q are paraphilias, which are defined as “persistent and recurrent sexual interests, urges, fantasies, or behaviors of marked intensity involving objects, activities, or even situations that are atypical in nature.” Many kinks are considered paraphilias, but so are more deviant urges such as pedophilia and zoophilia. As you can see from one of the screenshots in my last Substack, some such paraphiles believe their paraphilias make them queer.

This should concern all LGB people, who have been wrongly maligned as sexual deviants for millennia, that true perverts - many of whom are not homosexual - are trying to glom onto the acronym as some sort of protective identity. Pedophilia and zoophilia are not “queer identities,” they’re disgusting sexual aberrations.

The Q serves a purpose aside from allowing more people into the acronym, and that is the creation of an artificial voting demographic. Queer can be a political identity, and the more people who buy into victimhood narratives centered around the “queer community” (though most of the related hate violence affects gay men), the more votes you can direct toward your desired candidate. Groupthink is powerful, and promoting in-group loyalty has led to a solidly left-wing coalition identifying as Q. When was the last time you saw a right-wing homosexual call themself queer?

As a gay man, my vote and mind are my own. I have nothing in common with a heterosexual female who calls herself a they/them, and trying to claim my rights and legal protections are somehow tied to TQ+ causes - as many activist organizations do - is blatantly false.

For these reasons, we need to drop the Q (not the Star Trek villain of that namesake!) LGB and T people need to assert our own respective boundaries to prevent interlopers from claiming social proximity to us or tethering us to causes that are not in our best interest.

==

Everything after the LGB is heterosexual. The lack of definition around "queer" is a feature, not a bug. The purpose is to enable expansion without limits, so that anyone can leverage the stolen valor of the gay rights movements to masquerade as "marginalized" for their fetish, their imaginary sexuality (e.g. "demisexual") or as we've already seen with "minor attracted person," to try and legitimize their mental illness as an "identity."

If you're LGB and haven't seen who is trying to associate themselves with you, start paying attention.

If you're transsexual (i.e. clinical gender dysphoria), and you haven't been paying attention to the "transgenders" (gender non-conforming political queer theory) who've taken over your space, look around and speak up.

[themultifandomdisaster]

Duudee these terfs are getting on my nerves so bad. Like literally get OUT of here with that "lgb drop the tq+" crap. Actually what the fuck

[alliumdykes]

Small thing that i have learnt to pick up on. If anyone says it should be LGB and not LGBTQ+stay far far away. That is classic transphobia. This is from the “drop the T” movement which you can guess. Is trying to remove trans people.

Even small things like “It should be LGB vs TQ+ vs cishet” Is a very big red flag (also major aspec and intersex removal. Lumping aspec and intersex people as immediately “non-queer” when its the persons choice)