Tumgik
#but motivated differently
mrsaltieri-real · 1 year
Note
Do you think murder is sexual for the ghostfaces?
Oh, good question.
I think it depends on which Ghostface you’re talking about. Ghostface as his own character? Absolutely 100%. The individual Ghostfaces? I’m going to do a small dive in. Don’t mind me.
Billy Loomis: Yes and no. To a certain degree, I’m kind of leaning toward yes. He definitely gets off on violence, but his motive was purely driven out of revenge and that’s pretty hard to ignore. He definitely liked knowing he fucked Sidney knowing he was going to try kill her (he did NOT enjoy fucking her though.)
Stu Macher: Yes. Immediately yes. Out of love for Billy, but he absolutely got off on violence. He was having way too much fun the entire time for him not to be rock fucking hard, come on.
Mickey Altieri: Are you kidding me??? Obviously YES. He’s probably the Ghostface that’s driven the most sexually. He considers sex and murder two sides of the same coin, is 1000% rock hard the entire time. Enjoys both forms of penetration way too much, how disgustingly poetic. Sick cunt. I love him.
Nancy Loomis: No.
Roman Bridger: No.
Charlie Walker: Eh. He was having way too much fun and was way too brutal (especially when killing Olivia) for anyone to say he wasn’t getting at least a little hard over it.
Jill Roberts: She was only horny for herself and her motive. She had Charlie did all the work. Soooo NO, it’s not sexual for Jolt- I mean Jill.
Amber Freeman: Immediately YES. Did you see the way she was killing??? Instantly wet. And I mean, so was she.
Richie Kirsch: Tough one. I’m gonna go with a firm maybe. He was too hard over the Stab movies for me to just say no.
Wayne Bailey: No. he was brutal, but no.
Ethan Landry: Although my perfect boy was running around having an absolute ball in act 3, I’m going to go with no. He was just trying to live up to Richie’s standards. But that’s not to say he wasn’t enjoying it at least a little bit, probably more than he expected.
Quinn Bailey: Sex positive queen, but I’m going to once again say no. She was revenge driven entirely, I don’t think she necessarily ENJOYED it in that way.
Honourable mention: Jason Carvey: Immediately fucking yes. His speech about Laura after he killed her??? No other explanation needed.
Sorry this was a simple question and I just went off and ran with it but here we are.
114 notes · View notes
liones-s · 6 months
Text
one of the biggest things I can advocate for (in academia, but also just in life) is to build credibility with yourself. It’s easy to fall into the habit of thinking of yourself as someone who does things last minute or who struggles to start tasks. people will tell you that you just need to build different habits, but I know for me at least the idea of ‘habit’ is sort of abstract and dehumanizing. Credibility is more like ‘I’ve done this before, so I know I can do it, and more importantly I trust myself to do it’. you set an assignment goal for the day and you meet it, and then you feel stronger setting one the next day. You establish a relationship with yourself that’s built on confidence and trust. That in turn starts to erode the barrier of insecurity and perfectionism and makes it easier to start and finish tasks. reframing the narrative as a process of building credibility makes it easier to celebrate each step and recognize how strong your relationship with yourself can become
28K notes · View notes
eastgaysian · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
63K notes · View notes
hallwords · 1 year
Text
to you, it's a shitty sentence. to some random bitch 500 miles away, it's a fire line that'll haunt them for the next 17 years.
you don't know how impactful your writing is because it's been in your brain for far too long now. you've stared at it for hours and repeated "this sucks" over and over again to the point that you killed your capacity to feel anything about your work.
but trust me, once you get your shit out there, someone's gonna go over that paragraph you hate and go "jesus fucking christ" and put the book down to have an existential crisis.
47K notes · View notes
lgbtlunaverse · 8 months
Text
There's a version of the "don't go grocery shopping while hungry" rule specifically for writers where you should never under any circumstances be allowed to touch your draft within 3 hours of reading a really good story. Because sometimes when you read something great your head goes "fuck this is so much better than my stuff I should make that more like THIS instead!" Look at me. That's the devil talking and you should close the document NOW.
12K notes · View notes
akanemnon · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Out of options
FIRST - PREVIOUS - NEXT
MASTERPOST (for the full series / FAQ / reference sheets)
3K notes · View notes
lunacelebrateslife · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
3K notes · View notes
crackers4jenn · 10 months
Text
spn is such a funny show, it'll be like:
Naomi tells Cas he has to choose "us, or them" and 'them' is meant to imply Sam and Dean both, but then
she makes Cas kill fake copies of Dean only
Or Metatron will speechify about how Cas is "in love... with humanity"
and then give Cas another lil speech about how it was all "to save Dean Winchester. That was your goal, right? I mean, you draped yourself in the flag of Heaven, but ultimately it was about saving one human, right?"
Ishim shows up and tries to tell Cas how weak he is for befriending Sam and Dean
and then when he wants to "cure" Cas of his human weakness, that weakness is just Dean
AND THEN you'll have things like
Sam will say that Cas is family, that he'd die for him
but he also refers to Cas as an "it" just hanging around in a vessel strong enough to take on Lucifer (in season 11!! It's not like he said that in s4 or something, it was like 8 years after knowing the guy)
Or in "Regarding Dean," Dean will say to Sam "and our best friend's an angel!"
and then when he's by himself in the mirror, he'll say "and Cast--Cas is my best friend."
3K notes · View notes
uncanny-tranny · 11 months
Text
Basically, my philosophy around disability fakers is: I would rather a thousand people fake a disability than have one disabled person suffer without care, aids, compassion, or any help.
4K notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
4 MINUTES (2024) I 1.02 "Do the police normally do house check-ins."
670 notes · View notes
bixels · 1 month
Text
I'm not explaining why re-imagining characters as POC is not the same as white-washing, here of all places should fucking understand.
#personal#delete later#no patrick. “black washing” is not as harmful as white washing.#come on guys get it together#seeing people in my reblogs talk about “reverse racism” and double standards is genuinely hypocrisy#say it with me: white washing is intrinsically tied to a historical and systematic erasure of poc figures literature and history.#it is an inherently destructive act that deplatforms underrepresented faces and voices#in favor of a light-skinned aesthetic hegemony#redesigning characters as poc is an act of dismantling symbols of whiteness in fiction in favor of diversification and reclamation#(note that i am talking about individual acts by individual artists as was the topic of this discourse. not on an industry-scale)#redesigning characters as poc is not tied to hundreds of years of systemic racism and abuse and power dynamics. that is a fact.#you are not replacing an underrepresented person with an oft-represented person. it is the opposite#if you feel threatened or upset or uncomfortable about this then sorry but you are not aware of how much more worse it is for poc#if representation is unequal then these acts cannot be equivalent. you can't point to an imbalanced scale and say they weigh the same#if you recognize that bipoc people are minorities then you should recognize that these two things are not the same#while i agree that “black washing” can lead to color-blind casting and writing the behavior here is on an individual level#a black artist drawing their favorite anime character as black because they feel a shared solidarity is not a threat to you#i mean. most anime characters are east asian and i as an east asian person certainly don't feel threatened or erased. neither should you.#there's much to be said about the politics of blackwashing (i don't even know if that's the right word for it)#but point standing. whitewashing is an inherently more destructive act. both through its history of maintaining power dynamics#and the simple fact that it's taking away from groups of people who have less to begin with#if you feel upset or uncomfortable about a fictional white character being redesigned as poc by an artist on twitter#i sincerely hope you're able to explore these feelings and find avenues to empathizing with poc who have had their figures#(both real and fictional) erased; buried; and replaced by white figures for hundreds of years#i sincerely hope you can understand the difference in motivations and connotations behind whitewashing and blackwashing#classic bixels “i'm not talking about this chat. i'm not” (puts my media studies major to use in the tags and talks the fuck outta it)
1K notes · View notes
amarguerite · 2 months
Text
honestly I think there's a huge generation of readers who read 'the song of the lioness' at an impressionable age and it rewired their brains
546 notes · View notes
lovelooksgudonu · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
1K notes · View notes
hiekka · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
fuck everything else i just drew him with semi-consistent features also this is the immediate aftermath of the last sketch i posted
701 notes · View notes
mayasaura · 2 years
Text
Harrow got so unbelievablely horny dreaming about Gideon's rolled up sleeves exposing her lean, taut muscle, a little dewy with sweat and steam but you know what.... thinking about it. Gideon does not disrobe basically ever, except in private to bathe. A tantalizing glimpse of forearm may legitimately be the most Harrow's imagination has to work with
4K notes · View notes
gothhabiba · 2 years
Text
Another bewildering assertion I've seen floating around is that the United States of America deliberately destabilises West Asia and North Africa, murders millions of civilians, destroys towns and cities, arms militias &c. because of Islamophobia. I assure you that this is not true and that no one who is serious about understanding geopolitics or Islamophobia has this analysis. Islamophobia may have early modern or pre-modern instantiations, but in its current context it is very much a result of and a rhetorical and social justification for the geopolitical, economic, resource-driven exigencies of imperial capitalism. You're looking at a cart and insisting that it is pulling a horse around
5K notes · View notes