The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock
T. S. ELIOT
S’io credesse che mia risposta fosse
A persona che mai tornasse al mondo,
Questa fiamma staria senza piu scosse.
Ma percioche giammai di questo fondo
Non torno vivo alcun, s’i’odo il vero,
Senza tema d’infamia ti rispondo.
Let us go then, you and I,
When the evening is spread out against the sky
Like a patient etherized upon a table;
Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,
The muttering retreats
Of restless nights in one-night cheap hotels
And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells:
Streets that follow like a tedious argument
Of insidious intent
To lead you to an overwhelming question ...
Oh, do not ask, “What is it?”
Let us go and make our visit.
In the room the women come and go
Talking of Michelangelo.
The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes,
The yellow smoke that rubs its muzzle on the window-panes,
Licked its tongue into the corners of the evening,
Lingered upon the pools that stand in drains,
Let fall upon its back the soot that falls from chimneys,
Slipped by the terrace, made a sudden leap,
And seeing that it was a soft October night,
Curled once about the house, and fell asleep.
And indeed there will be time
For the yellow smoke that slides along the street,
Rubbing its back upon the window-panes;
There will be time, there will be time
To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet;
There will be time to murder and create,
And time for all the works and days of hands
That lift and drop a question on your plate;
Time for you and time for me,
And time yet for a hundred indecisions,
And for a hundred visions and revisions,
Before the taking of a toast and tea.
In the room the women come and go
Talking of Michelangelo.
And indeed there will be time
To wonder, “Do I dare?” and, “Do I dare?”
Time to turn back and descend the stair,
With a bald spot in the middle of my hair —
(They will say: “How his hair is growing thin!”)
My morning coat, my collar mounting firmly to the chin,
My necktie rich and modest, but asserted by a simple pin —
(They will say: “But how his arms and legs are thin!”)
Do I dare
Disturb the universe?
In a minute there is time
For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.
For I have known them all already, known them all:
Have known the evenings, mornings, afternoons,
I have measured out my life with coffee spoons;
I know the voices dying with a dying fall
Beneath the music from a farther room.
So how should I presume?
And I have known the eyes already, known them all—
The eyes that fix you in a formulated phrase,
And when I am formulated, sprawling on a pin,
When I am pinned and wriggling on the wall,
Then how should I begin
To spit out all the butt-ends of my days and ways?
And how should I presume?
And I have known the arms already, known them all—
Arms that are braceleted and white and bare
(But in the lamplight, downed with light brown hair!)
Is it perfume from a dress
That makes me so digress?
Arms that lie along a table, or wrap about a shawl.
And should I then presume?
And how should I begin?
Shall I say, I have gone at dusk through narrow streets
And watched the smoke that rises from the pipes
Of lonely men in shirt-sleeves, leaning out of windows? ...
I should have been a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.
And the afternoon, the evening, sleeps so peacefully!
Smoothed by long fingers,
Asleep ... tired ... or it malingers,
Stretched on the floor, here beside you and me.
Should I, after tea and cakes and ices,
Have the strength to force the moment to its crisis?
But though I have wept and fasted, wept and prayed,
Though I have seen my head (grown slightly bald) brought in upon a platter,
I am no prophet — and here’s no great matter;
I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker,
And I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker,
And in short, I was afraid.
And would it have been worth it, after all,
After the cups, the marmalade, the tea,
Among the porcelain, among some talk of you and me,
Would it have been worth while,
To have bitten off the matter with a smile,
To have squeezed the universe into a ball
To roll it towards some overwhelming question,
To say: “I am Lazarus, come from the dead,
Come back to tell you all, I shall tell you all”—
If one, settling a pillow by her head
Should say: “That is not what I meant at all;
That is not it, at all.”
And would it have been worth it, after all,
Would it have been worth while,
After the sunsets and the dooryards and the sprinkled streets,
After the novels, after the teacups, after the skirts that trail along the floor—
And this, and so much more?—
It is impossible to say just what I mean!
But as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen:
Would it have been worth while
If one, settling a pillow or throwing off a shawl,
And turning toward the window, should say:
“That is not it at all,
That is not what I meant, at all.”
No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be;
Am an attendant lord, one that will do
To swell a progress, start a scene or two,
Advise the prince; no doubt, an easy tool,
Deferential, glad to be of use,
Politic, cautious, and meticulous;
Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;
At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—
Almost, at times, the Fool.
I grow old ... I grow old ...
I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled.
Shall I part my hair behind? Do I dare to eat a peach?
I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach.
I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each.
I do not think that they will sing to me.
I have seen them riding seaward on the waves
Combing the white hair of the waves blown back
When the wind blows the water white and black.
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
Source: Collected Poems 1909-1962 (1963)
2 notes
·
View notes
Personality and Cognitive Quotients: Insights from Psychology
Introduction
The relationship between personality traits and mental abilities has been a central theme in psychology, offering understanding into how individual differences affect behavior and performance. Traditionally, intelligence was narrowly defined as the ability to reason logically, plan systematically, and solve problems quickly – typically measured by IQ tests. Multiple Intelligences Theory by Howard Gardner enlarged this notion by suggesting that there are many types of intelligences such as linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal intrapersonal and naturalistic intelligences among others. This broader perspective points out that intellect is not one thing but a multitude of skills indicative of diverse ways people interact with their environment; thus far research has continued to dwell on these issues as well as relationships between Big Five Personality Traits namely Openness Conscientiousness Extraversion Agreeableness Neuroticism with different dimensions of intelligence also social functioning.
Openness to Experience and Curiosity Quotients
Closely related to openness is curiosity which can be measured using Curiosity Quotient (CQ) that describes an individual’s thirst for information or desire for novelty. According to von Stumm et al., (2011), intellectual curiosity – a major component of Openness has been found to significantly contribute towards academic achievement even beyond traditional cognitive abilities. Such curiosity encourages learners’ deep involvement with content leading higher level cognitive investments while at the same time enhancing creative problem solving skills. In other words it implies those who are open minded not only accept new ideas but also tend explore them more thereby widening their knowledge base and improving various aspects of thinking.This finding suggests therefore that fostering curiosity should be seen as strategy for promoting intellectual growth hence educational institutions should create environments which nurture investigative learning through asking questions.
Agreeableness Social Intelligence (EQ)
Agreeableness is characterized by empathy cooperation trust etc., all these traits have strong relationships with Emotional Intelligence (EQ). For instance Nusbaum and Zuroff (2017) conducted a meta-analysis which showed that higher levels of agreeableness were associated with greater emotional awareness as well better interpersonal skills. This implies that individuals who score highly on Agreeableness are more likely to be good at reading other people’s moods while also being skilled in dealing with them appropriately within social settings – thus this ability may help one succeed both personally professionally. Additionally having such an attribute means being able to understand others’ emotions easily hence it enhances communication abilities thereby promoting conflict resolution.
Research Associations Between Neuroticism, Stress, and Agreeableness
Neuroticism is strongly correlated with stress sensitivity where many studies have shown that people high in neuroticism tend perceive daily events or situations more stressful than those low in neurosis. Moreover, it has been observed that individuals scoring at extreme ends of this trait dimension exhibit different patterns coping style when faced by same stressors; indeed high scorers often respond through negative affectivity such anxiety fear sadness etc., whereas their counterparts express positive feelings like joy excitement happiness. Furthermore apart from heightened reactivity towards negative aspects life due inability regulate emotions properly these individuals also take longer recover from adverse experiences resulting prolonged periods characterized by increased anxiousness along with further maladaptive behaviors aimed reducing stress levels.Research has established close relationship between these two variables so much so
On the other hand, EQ usually correlates negatively with neuroticism. Emotional regulation and awareness necessary for EQ are often compromised at higher levels of Neuroticism. People with high neurotic symptoms may find it difficult to understand or manage their own feelings as well as misinterpret others’ emotional signals hence affecting their social interactions adversely.
Neuroticism and Agreeableness integrated within EQ
It should be noted that when both agreeableness and neuroticism are considered along with each other in relation to emotional intelligence (EI); there can be complex interactions between these two personality traits towards EI. For example; an individual who is highly agreeable as well as very neurotic might have empathy skills on one hand but also fear evaluations or conflicts arising from such relationships due to extreme worry about them being maintained harmoniously thus creating mixed self management abilities where this person has good interpersonal skills but lacks stress coping strategies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while it is true that agreeableness positively correlates with Emotional Intelligence (EQ) leading better understanding of others’ emotions and more improved relationship building; generally neurosis undermines this concept by making regulation process too complicated thereby impeding ability to cope up with stress among individuals having different levels of these traits. Such understandings are important because they help people design interventions which maximize benefits derived from being highly agreeable while minimizing negative impacts associated with high levels of Neuroticism in various areas like personal growth or professional development programs.However, combination does not always equal so; therefore we should know that there is no neat equation between them but rather a significant interplay between these components which greatly shapes individual’s emotional intelligence profile.
The study into how personality affects cognitive ability measures provides us with insights about human behaviour and potentiality. Such understanding enables educators come up personalized educational plans which cater for diverse personalities alongside intellectual capabilities. By recognizing strengths inherent within each personality type employers can create an environment conducive for optimal job performance while fostering good relations among employees. Ultimately this knowledge equips people to devise more inclusive strategies aimed at personal growth both at social dimensions such as friendship building or self awareness levels.Thus it can be said that the interrelationship between personality and intelligence is critical in our quest for success.
References:
Brackett, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2003). Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1147-1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254596
Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Extremera, N. (2006). Emotional intelligence: A theoretical and empirical review of its first 15 years of history. Psicothema, 18, 7-12. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3271.pdf
Lahey, B.B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism.American Psychologist,64(4),241-242.doi:10.1037/a0015309
Lopes,P.N., Salovey,P.,Côté,S.,& Beers,M.(2005).Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction .Emotion ,5(1),113-118.doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.113
Mikolajczak,M., Luminet,O., Leroy,C., & Roy,E.(2007).Psychometric properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire:Factor structure,reliability construct,and incremental validity in a French-speaking population.Journal of Personality Assessment ,88(3),338-353.doi:10..1080/00223890701333431
Nusbaum,E.C.& Zuroff,D.C.(2017)Relations of the five-factor model of personality with perceived and actual emotional intelligence: A meta-analysis.Personality and Individual Differences,106,223-229.doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.044
Suls,J.,& Martin,R.(2005).The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure,mood spillover,and maladaptive coping.Journal of Personality ,73(6),1485-1510.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x
von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind:intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance.Perspectives on Psychological Science , 6(6),574-588.doi:10.1177/1745691611421204
0 notes