#easy document generation

[pdqdocs]

Simplified Document Creation with PDQ Docs: Streamlining Your Workflow

In today’s fast-paced world, efficiency and time-saving tools are essential in every aspect of business and personal work. When it comes to document creation, many professionals face the challenge of managing complex formatting, collaboration, and time-consuming revisions. With PDQ Docs, document creation has been made easier, faster, and more streamlined than ever before. This innovative software is designed to simplify the process of creating professional documents, enabling users to focus on the content rather than the format.

How PDQ Docs Simplifies the Document Creation Process

PDQ Docs revolutionizes the way documents are created by providing a user-friendly interface and an array of powerful tools that reduce the complexity traditionally associated with document formatting. Whether you are drafting a simple letter, preparing a business report, or putting together a legal document, PDQ Docs makes the task significantly less daunting. The software eliminates the need for extensive knowledge of formatting techniques and complex features found in traditional word processors.

One of the key benefits of simplified document creation with PDQ Docs is its intuitive interface. The software is designed to be accessible for both beginners and advanced users, making it easy to create polished documents without the steep learning curve associated with other tools. Whether you are creating a document from scratch or modifying an existing template, PDQ Docs ensures that the process is as smooth and straightforward as possible.

Efficiency in Document Formatting

One of the most time-consuming aspects of simplified document creation is formatting. Whether it's aligning text, adjusting margins, or selecting the appropriate font size, these details can quickly become overwhelming. PDQ Docs simplifies this process by providing pre-set templates and automatic formatting options that save time and effort. You no longer need to manually adjust settings every time you create a new document. The software handles most formatting tasks for you, allowing you to focus more on the content itself.

Security and Reliability

When creating and sharing documents, especially in professional settings, security is a top priority. PDQ Docs offers robust security features to ensure that your documents are protected. The software encrypts your documents and stores them in a secure cloud environment, making it easy to access and edit them from anywhere while keeping them safe from unauthorized access. The cloud-based system also ensures that your documents are backed up, so you never have to worry about losing important work due to a computer malfunction or data loss.

Conclusion

Simplified document creation is no longer a distant goal, thanks to PDQ Docs. With its user-friendly interface, collaborative features, efficient formatting tools, and top-notch security, this document creation software is designed to save you time, reduce stress, and help you produce professional documents quickly. Whether you’re a small business owner, a student, or a professional in any industry, PDQ Docs is the ideal solution for simplifying the document creation process and improving your workflow. Try PDQ Docs today and experience the future of document creation.

[keymintt]

painted my brother's fave as a christmas gift

[quatregats]

Got to hate an application that tells you to have all your documents ready to start but then you can only find out what said documents are and get the links to the templates you're supposed to fill out by filling in half of the form :/

[saccharine-pink-lemonade]

being a writer has me googling some wacky wild things

[bmpmp3]

^ Rikka's autopitch trying to sing the bridge of this song

[sainteclectic]

howw are you writing these so fast whadda hell /positive

it's the power of autism

[seaofreverie]

So busy with Sparkstember that I almost forgot that I go back to school on tuesday

[communistkenobi]

A newborn baby girl will have to go through life with the wrong sex on her birth certificate after a registrar’s error, which her parents have been told they cannot change. Grace Bingham and her partner, Ewan Murray, were excited to register their first child at the Sutton-in-Ashfield Registration Office in Nottinghamshire last week. But, after nights of broken sleep, they failed to notice the registrar had written the wrong sex on the birth certificate until after it had been submitted. “We were horrified but assumed that, as we saw the mistake just a few seconds after it had happened, correcting it would be an easy matter,” said Murray. “But although the registrar apologised for her mistake – and the area manager also apologised – it turns out that birth certificates can’t be changed.”

this article is interesting because it demonstrates that cis people can very easily apply structural thinking to sex assignment - this couple immediately identifies that their daughter, having mistakenly been assigned male at birth by the registrar, will have administrative problems in employment, education, travel, and so on. they pretty adeptly identify the foundational role that sex assignment plays in the administrative and civil functions of a state, and how incorrect sex markers effectively produce a ‘rational’ reason for discrimination within these administrative and civil arenas:

The General Register Office (GRO), which is responsible for administering all civil registration in England and Wales, and the Home Office have both confirmed that Lilah’s birth certificate cannot be reissued, although an amendment can be made in the margin of the original document. But Bingham said this is not enough. “People reading a birth certificate might easily miss a tiny note in the margin – which means that Lilah could be regarded as male when she applies for school, her passport, for jobs – for everything that she needs a full birth certificate for.”

And given that this was published in The Guardian, this article makes zero mention as to why it’s impossible for this couple to receive an updated birth certificate with correct information (something the author notes was possible to do a year ago), but the reason is obviously transphobia. 

Now one might ask why there’s no exception for cis people whose birth certificates were recorded incorrectly at birth, but this reveals the instability of cissexualism. How would you determine who is a cis person with a mistaken birth certificate, versus a trans person who wants to change their mistaken sex assignment record? Sure, you could say well, this is an infant, of course she’s “really” “biologically” female (something the parents argue in the article as grounds for having their child’s birth certificate re-issued), but 1) that certainly can’t be argued for in all cases, 2) 'biological sex' is understood by medical doctors as alterable through hormones and surgery, which trans people are often required to undergo in order to change their records, and 3) binary sex assignment is already imprecise and discretionary, particularly if infants have sex characteristics that don’t conform to binary F/M assignment standards (which is part of how the category of intersex emerges, framing this failure to conform to state census categories as a biological defect - and in fact, many intersex people do not discover they are intersex until the onset of puberty or later, at which point they are even less in luck if they want to change their sex assignment - and if they don’t, if they are cis but have sex characteristics that do not conform to cis standards, they will be discriminated against anyway). 

Even setting aside the issue of transgender and intersex people for a moment, states fuck up all the time in administration! you've probably either experienced this directly or know someone who's had some kind of record fucked up by the government at some point in their life. If you get married they could fuck up changing your last name, fuck up your disability status, record your social insurance number wrong, print the wrong address on your driver’s license, fail to acknowledge you as a dependent when filing taxes, incorrectly mark you as having graduated when you’re still a student, fuck up your immigration paperwork, record your name wrong during immigration, etc etc into infinity, and this is not even getting into errors that occur when different levels of government pass information between one another. This level of administrative rigidity is purely to punish people who fail to perform cissexualism correctly, and in the case of this couple's child, the administrative error of the state is imputed to them as a personal failure that she and her parents will now have to deal with for the rest of their lives. 

I think the ultimate analysis is not that transphobia will become less precise and hit more "wrong" targets as it expands its reach, but that this is the exact same operational logic as all other liberal state measures - if you encounter a systemic issue, it’s your fault for not avoiding it, fuck you, go away. You’re poor because you’re lazy, you’re unhoused because you’re lazy, you’re disabled because you’re lazy, and your daughter is now administratively transsexual because you’re lazy. In this case, we don’t even need to assume the intentions of the state - they outright say it:

The family complained to the GRO but was told the mistake was their responsibility and could not be fully rectified. “The duty to ensure that information recorded in any particular entry is true is the responsibility of the person providing the information and not of the registrar general or the registrar recording the birth,” the GRO said.

[supersaiyajopping]

do people know about their blog archives. the archive function on tumblr dot com. the archive that every blog has and can be enabled to be reachable from your page. yourblog.tumblr.com/archive. the archive that makes sorting through tags and post types easy. the archive that goes in chronological order while filtering tags. does anyone remember. hello

[pdqdocs]

Creating documents the traditional way can be slow and tedious, often involving repetitive tasks and manual data entry. PDQ Docs simplifies this process by automating document generation, enabling users to create customized documents with just a click. Whether you need contracts, invoices, reports, or any other type of document, PDQ Docs offers an efficient solution that saves time and minimizes the risk of errors. For more visit: https://pdqdocs.com/

[jcmarchi]

5 Best AI SOP (Standard Operating Procedures) Generators – 2024

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/5-best-ai-sop-standard-operating-procedures-generators-2024/

5 Best AI SOP (Standard Operating Procedures) Generators – 2024

In today’s fast-paced business world, creating and maintaining standard operating procedures (SOPs) is crucial for ensuring consistency, efficiency, and quality across an organization. However, the process of creating SOPs can be time-consuming and tedious. This is where AI-powered SOP generators come into play, improving the way businesses create, update, and manage their SOPs.

In this article, we will introduce you to the top AI SOP generators that can help streamline your operations and boost productivity.

Guidde is an innovative AI-powered platform that simplifies the process of creating comprehensive how-to guides, training materials, onboarding documentation, FAQs, and standard operating procedures. By leveraging generative AI, Guidde automatically produces step-by-step video documentation, making it easy for teams to share knowledge with customers and employees.

One of the standout features of Guidde is its ability to automatically generate storylines as users record their workflows. This means that the platform can create a detailed, step-by-step description of the process being documented, saving users significant time and effort. Additionally, Guidde offers a wide range of AI-generated voiceovers in various languages, allowing users to add narration to their videos without the need for recording their own voice.

Guidde’s intuitive video editor makes it easy to customize auto-generated videos by adding annotations, blurring sensitive information, and incorporating branding elements. The platform also provides smart sharing options, enabling users to share guides with a simple link, embed them in web pages, or export them to multiple formats. Moreover, Guidde offers analytics features that provide valuable insights into the performance of video guides, helping teams to optimize their content and improve engagement.

Key features of Guidde:

Automatic storyline creation: Guidde uses GPT to generate step-by-step descriptions of your workflow as you record it.

AI-generated voiceovers: Choose from a wide range of AI voices in various languages to narrate your videos effortlessly.

Intuitive video editor: Easily customize auto-generated videos with annotations, blur sensitive information, and add branding.

Smart sharing: Share guides anywhere with a link, embed them, or export to multiple formats.

Analytics: Gain valuable insights into the performance of your video guides.

ClickUp is a versatile project management and collaboration platform that offers a range of tools and features to help teams optimize their workflows. Among these features is the ability to create and manage standard operating procedure documentation using customizable templates.

ClickUp provides users with a variety of pre-built SOP templates designed for different use cases, such as AI projects, online review management, nitrogen generator operation, contract pricing, and soap production. These templates serve as a starting point for teams to create their own SOPs, saving time and ensuring consistency across the organization.

One of the key benefits of using ClickUp for SOP management is the ability to customize templates to fit the specific needs of a team or organization. This flexibility allows teams to create SOPs that align with their unique processes and workflows. Additionally, the clear instructions provided by well-crafted SOPs can significantly improve efficiency and productivity, as team members have a reliable reference for executing tasks consistently.

Key features of Clickup SOP:

Pre-built SOP templates: ClickUp provides various templates for different use cases, such as AI projects, online review management, and contract pricing.

Customization: Templates can be tailored to fit the specific needs of a team or organization.

Improved efficiency: Clear instructions provided by SOPs enhance productivity and consistency.

Collaboration: ClickUp enables teams to collaborate and communicate within the platform, facilitating the creation and refinement of SOPs.

Centralized documentation: SOPs created in ClickUp are stored in a centralized location, making them easily accessible to all team members.

Image: Waybook

Waybook is a powerful AI-driven platform that automates the creation of comprehensive standard operating procedures based on simple user commands. By utilizing advanced algorithms, Waybook analyzes user requirements and generates tailored, step-by-step SOP documents that meet the specific needs of businesses and organizations.

One of the most impressive aspects of Waybook is its ability to generate detailed, customized SOPs quickly and efficiently. Users simply need to provide a brief description of the procedure they need, and Waybook’s AI will create a comprehensive outline of the core steps involved. This feature significantly reduces the time and effort required to develop SOPs, allowing businesses to allocate their resources more effectively.

Waybook offers a high degree of versatility, making it beneficial for various industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, IT, and finance. The platform also provides users with the flexibility to customize generated SOPs by adding more specificity and context as needed. Additionally, Waybook offers unlimited usage for creating procedures for any number of job roles, making it an attractive solution for businesses of all sizes.

Key features of Waybook:

Automatic SOP generation: Waybook AI quickly generates detailed, customized SOPs based on user input.

Versatility: Waybook AI is beneficial across various industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, IT, and finance.

Free unlimited usage: Generating SOPs with Waybook AI is 100% free, with unlimited usage for creating procedures for any number of job roles.

Customization: With a Waybook subscription, generated SOPs can be edited, customized, and aligned with unique processes.

Real-time compliance monitoring: Waybook AI provides real-time monitoring of SOP compliance, allowing businesses to identify areas for improvement and take corrective action.

Scribe is an AI-powered tool that enhances the process of creating documentation, such as standard operating procedures, help centers, user guides, and training materials. By transforming the way users develop and share how-to guides, Scribe simplifies the documentation process, making it accessible to everyone with just a few clicks.

One of the standout features of Scribe is its ability to automatically generate documentation by capturing user actions in real-time. As users perform a task, Scribe records each step, including mouse movements, clicks, and keystrokes, and generates a comprehensive step-by-step guide. This feature eliminates the need for manual screenshotting and writing, significantly reducing the time and effort required to create SOPs and other documentation.

Scribe’s AI-powered capabilities extend beyond simple recording. The platform uses ChatGPT to auto-generate unique titles for each SOP based on the recorded actions, making the guides easily searchable and shareable. Additionally, Scribe includes annotated screenshots to provide visual clarity for complex processes, ensuring that users can follow along easily.

Key features of Scribe:

Automatic documentation generation: Scribe captures your actions in real-time and documents each step, generating comprehensive step-by-step guides.

AI-powered: Scribe uses ChatGPT to auto-generate unique titles for each SOP based on your mouse movements, clicks, and keystrokes, making them searchable and shareable.

Visual clarity: Scribe includes annotated screenshots to demonstrate each click, providing visual clarity for complex processes.

Customization: Guides generated by Scribe have a standardized layout that can be customized to match your style and branding. You can add visuals, images, videos, GIFs, and links to reference materials.

Collaboration: Scribe encourages team collaboration with built-in feedback features, allowing teammates to comment, react, and offer insights to refine the documentation.

Flowster is an AI-powered platform designed to streamline the process of creating highly detailed standard operating procedures and managing workflows. By automating repetitive tasks through easy-to-use, no-code workflows, Flowster enables businesses to optimize their operations and improve overall efficiency.

One of the most valuable features of Flowster is its extensive library of process templates, which covers a wide range of industries and use cases. These templates serve as a starting point for businesses to create their own SOPs, saving significant time and effort in the process. Flowster’s AI-guided workflow creation tool further simplifies the process by tailoring templates to the specific needs of each business, making workflow creation nearly foolproof.

Flowster’s workflows utilize conditional logic, ensuring that team members only see the steps relevant to their specific roles and responsibilities. This feature streamlines the execution of tasks and minimizes confusion, as users are not overwhelmed with irrelevant information. Additionally, Flowster integrates with popular tools like Trello and Zapier, enhancing the overall workflow experience and enabling seamless collaboration among team members.

Key features of Flowster:

Massive template library: Flowster offers thousands of detailed process templates for various industries and use cases, such as hiring, product launches, and more.

AI-guided workflow creation: The AI helps tailor templates to your specific needs, making workflow creation almost foolproof. It regularly updates workflows if processes change over time.

Conditional logic: Workflows use conditional logic, so team members only see steps relevant to them.

Integrations: Flowster integrates with popular tools like Trello and Zapier to enhance the workflow experience.

Collaboration: It allows teams to collaborate on SOPs and workflows in one centralized place.

Streamline Your SOPs with AI-Powered Generators

AI-powered SOP generators have become indispensable tools for organizations seeking to streamline their operations, improve efficiency, and maintain consistency. By leveraging the power of artificial intelligence, these platforms automate the process of creating, updating, and managing standard operating procedures, saving businesses significant time and resources.

Whether you opt for the video-based guides of Guidde, the customizable templates of ClickUp, the automated SOP generation of Waybook, the real-time documentation capabilities of Scribe, or the AI-guided workflows of Flowster, adopting an AI SOP generator can innovate the way your organization manages its processes. As you explore the options available, consider your specific needs and choose the tool that best aligns with your goals to unlock the full potential of AI-driven SOP management.

[sophiamcdougall]

You're a reasonably informed person on the internet. You've experienced things like no longer being able to get files off an old storage device, media you've downloaded suddenly going poof, sites and forums with troves full of people's thoughts and ideas vanishing forever. You've heard of cybercrime. You've read articles about lost media. You have at least a basic understanding that digital data is vulnerable, is what I'm saying. I'm guessing that you're also aware that history is, you know... important? And that it's an ongoing study, requiring ... data about how people live? And that it's not just about stanning celebrities that happen to be dead? Congratulations, you are significantly better-informed than the British government! So they're currently like "Oh hai can we destroy all these historical documents pls? To save money? Because we'll digitise them first so it's fine! That'll be easy, cheap and reliable -- right? These wills from the 1850s will totally be fine for another 170 years as a PNG or whatever, yeah? We didn't need to do an impact assesment about this because it's clearly win-win! We'd keep the physical wills of Famous People™ though because Famous People™ actually matter, unlike you plebs. We don't think there are any equalities implications about this, either! Also the only examples of Famous People™ we can think of are all white and rich, only one is a woman and she got famous because of the guy she married. Kisses!"

Yes, this is the same Government that's like "Oh no removing a statue of slave trader is erasing history :(" You have, however, until 23 February 2024 to politely inquire of them what the fuck they are smoking. And they will have to publish a summary of the responses they receive. And it will look kind of bad if the feedback is well-argued, informative and overwhelmingly negative and they go ahead and do it anyway. I currently edit documents including responses to consultations like (but significantly less insane) than this one. Responses do actually matter. I would particularly encourage British people/people based in the UK to do this, but as far as I can see it doesn't say you have to be either. If you are, say, a historian or an archivist, or someone who specialises in digital data do say so and draw on your expertise in your answers. This isn't a question of filling out a form. You have to manually compose an email answering the 12 questions in the consultation paper at the link above. I'll put my own answers under the fold. Note -- I never know if I'm being too rude in these sorts of things. You probably shouldn't be ruder than I have been.

Please do not copy and paste any of this: that would defeat the purpose. This isn't a petition, they need to see a range of individual responses. But it may give you a jumping-off point.

Question 1: Should the current law providing for the inspection of wills be preserved?

Yes. Our ability to understand our shared past is a fundamental aspect of our heritage. It is not possible for any authority to know in advance what future insights they are supporting or impeding by their treatment of material evidence. Safeguarding the historical record for future generations should be considered an extremely important duty.

Question 2: Are there any reforms you would suggest to the current law enabling wills to be inspected?

No.

Question 3: Are there any reasons why the High Court should store original paper will documents on a permanent basis, as opposed to just retaining a digitised copy of that material?

Yes. I am amazed that the recent cyber attack on the British Library, which has effectively paralysed it completely, not been sufficient to answer this question for you.  I also refer you to the fate of the Domesday Project. Digital storage is useful and can help more people access information; however, it is also inherently fragile. Malice, accident, or eventual inevitable obsolescence not merely might occur, but absolutely should be expected. It is ludicrously naive and reflects a truly unpardonable ignorance to assume that information preserved only in digital form is somehow inviolable and safe, or that a physical document once digitised, never need be digitised again..At absolute minimum, it should be understood as certain that at least some of any digital-only archive will eventually be permanently lost. It is not remotely implausible that all of it would be. Preserving the physical documents provides a crucial failsafe. It also allows any errors in reproduction -- also inevitable-- to be, eventually, seen and corrected. Note that maintaining, upgrading and replacing digital infrastructure is not free, easy or reliable. Over the long term, risks to the data concerned can only accumulate.

"Unlike the methods for preserving analog documents that have been honed over millennia, there is no deep precedence to look to regarding the management of digital records. As such, the processing, long-term storage, and distribution potential of archival digital data are highly unresolved issues. [..] the more digital data is migrated, translated, and re-compressed into new formats, the more room there is for information to be lost, be it at the microbit-level of preservation. Any failure to contend with the instability of digital storage mediums, hardware obsolescence, and software obsolescence thus meets a terminal end—the definitive loss of information. The common belief that digital data is safe so long as it is backed up according to the 3-2-1 rule (3 copies on 2 different formats with 1 copy saved off site) belies the fact that it is fundamentally unclear how long digital information can or will remain intact. What is certain is that its unique vulnerabilities do become more pertinent with age."  -- James Boyda, On Loss in the 21st Century: Digital Decay and the Archive, Introduction.

Question 4: Do you agree that after a certain time original paper documents (from 1858 onwards) may be destroyed (other than for famous individuals)? Are there any alternatives, involving the public or private sector, you can suggest to their being destroyed?

Absolutely not. And I would have hoped we were past the "great man" theory of history. Firstly, you do not know which figures will still be considered "famous" in the future and which currently obscure individuals may deserve and eventually receive greater attention. I note that of the three figures you mention here as notable enough to have their wills preserved, all are white, the majority are male (the one woman having achieved fame through marriage) and all were wealthy at the time of their death. Any such approach will certainly cull evidence of the lives of women, people of colour and the poor from the historical record, and send a clear message about whose lives you consider worth remembering.

Secondly, the famous and successsful are only a small part of our history. Understanding the realities that shaped our past and continue to mould our present requires evidence of the lives of so-called "ordinary people"!

Did you even speak to any historians before coming up with this idea?

Entrusting the documents to the private sector would be similarly disastrous. What happens when a private company goes bust or decides that preserving this material is no longer profitable? What reasonable person, confronted with our crumbling privatised water infrastructure, would willingly consign any part of our heritage to a similar fate?

Question 5: Do you agree that there is equivalence between paper and digital copies of wills so that the ECA 2000 can be used?

No. And it raises serious questions about the skill and knowledge base within HMCTS and the government that the very basic concepts of data loss and the digital dark age appear to be unknown to you. I also refer you to the Domesday Project.

Question 6: Are there any other matters directly related to the retention of digital or paper wills that are not covered by the proposed exercise of the powers in the ECA 2000 that you consider are necessary?

Destroying the physical documents will always be an unforgivable dereliction of legal and moral duty.

Question 7: If the Government pursues preserving permanently only a digital copy of a will document, should it seek to reform the primary legislation by introducing a Bill or do so under the ECA 2000?

Destroying the physical documents will always be an unforgivable dereliction of legal and moral duty.

Question 8: If the Government moves to digital only copies of original will documents, what do you think the retention period for the original paper wills should be? Please give reasons and state what you believe the minimum retention period should be and whether you consider the Government’s suggestion of 25 years to be reasonable.

There is no good version of this plan. The physical documents should be preserved.

Question 9: Do you agree with the principle that wills of famous people should be preserved in the original paper form for historic interest?

This question betrays deep ignorance of what "historic interest" actually is. The study of history is not simply glorified celebrity gossip. If anything, the physical wills of currently famous people could be considered more expendable as it is likely that their contents are so widely diffused as to be relatively "safe", whereas the wills of so-called "ordinary people" will, especially in aggregate, provide insights that have not yet been explored.

Question 10: Do you have any initial suggestions on the criteria which should be adopted for identifying famous/historic figures whose original paper will document should be preserved permanently?

Abandon this entire lamentable plan. As previously discussed, you do not and cannot know who will be considered "famous" in the future, and fame is a profoundly flawed criterion of historical significance.

Question 11: Do you agree that the Probate Registries should only permanently retain wills and codicils from the documents submitted in support of a probate application? Please explain, if setting out the case for retention of any other documents.

No, all the documents should be preserved indefinitely.

Question 12: Do you agree that we have correctly identified the range and extent of the equalities impacts under each of these proposals set out in this consultation? Please give reasons and supply evidence of further equalities impacts as appropriate.

No. You appear to have neglected equalities impacts entirely. As discussed, in your drive to prioritise "famous people", your plan will certainly prioritise the white, wealthy and mostly the male, as your "Charles Dickens, Charles Darwin and Princess Diana" examples amply indicate. This plan will create a two-tier system where evidence of the lives of the privileged is carefully preserved while information regarding people of colour, women, the working class and other disadvantaged groups is disproportionately abandoned to digital decay and eventual loss. Current and future historians from, or specialising in the history of minority groups will be especially impoverished by this.  

[eraserbread]

older bf nanami😍😍😍😍😍😍🤤🤤🤤🤤

*rubs hands together like a devious fly*

43 was an eventful year for nanami... fresh out of a decade-long marriage and fitted with the shiny new title of CFO. he just bought a skyrise apartment in cold, hard, cash and slept in maid-pressed sheets every night.

the best part is, his workload was nearly nonexistent. sure, he's sent a few documents to sign and look over, but the most hours he's pulled since the promotion was less than four in a day. truly a life well-earned.

so, now he spends his thursday mornings tucked against you -- his gorgeous twenty-one-year-old girlfriend, naked, snoozing in the canyon between your breasts.

you're both completely bare from a night well spent and glued to each other by the hip. he loves you, you love him, and his stuffed pockets and superior generosity were only the icing on the cake. there was no part of you that equates him to his wealth, but it's nice not having to want for anything.

it's like god was with you when you accepted that mid-year internship at his company. as a finance student, there's nothing you could learn on paper that you couldn't learn better in person.

and nanami was the best teacher. so thorough, stoic, and strict. It's easy to daydream about him and his greying roots. him and his deep chuckle and eyebrow quirk.

if the perfect older man existed, he'd have that title.

you two wake up halfway to noon, sliding out of bed with his long arm tangled around you.

"this internship is paid, but i don't claim taxes on it, right? since I'm a student?" you have no idea why that's what you dreamt of when you just had your body ravaged the night before, but it was.

"good morning to you, too." nanami yawns, sitting with his back to you on the other side of the bed. "yes, you claim taxes on it."

"then, can you give me a raise?"

"if i give you a raise, they'll just pull more money out. what's wrong, kid, you short on money? I can just make up the 10% in cash."

you're so close to saying yes, but you didn't care that much about the money. it was just on your mind when you fell asleep and you wouldn't stop thinking about it until you asked him.

then, he looks at you over his shoulder, bedhead all out of place and dark eyes shadowed. it makes you bite over your lip and say things you don't mean to say.

"yeah, i want the money. but, i also want you, right now."

you're crawling back over the bed, he's turning around to meet your touch. "no. money or sex. what kind of man do you think I am?"

you mumble, pressing your lips to the edge of his jaw. after all, you have to give to get. "a very generous one," you purr.

"i'm serious." he has you by the throat, applying just enough pressure to make your pretty eyes flutter shut. you're sitting over your heels, brows furrowing when your arousal starts to drip down through your legs.

nanami is not shy when it comes to handling you accordingly. he always has a comfortably tight hand around your neck, shoulders, or between your legs.

and that morning he keeps his hand pressed to your throat when he fucks you in full nelson. he's whispering filthy shit in your ear, only moving from the choke when you let your knees fall and he has to slap you back to your senses.

he's spent all of his good years envisioning his inner sex addict, now he's living it. you can keep up with him and you love it when he treats you like this.

more fingers in your mouth, more hands in your hair, more degrading, filthy names.

all for him to smile at your fucked-out, sweaty figure when he's done and call you beautiful.

[pueriled]

Useful websites / links for rentry , bundlrs , gfx & etc for you!

symbol sanatorium - Links to a google document with a ton of symbols , kaomojis & text layouts. I use it for pretty much all of my recent rentrys.

sozaino.site - Website that's been making its rounds on rentry as of late, useful for graphic making. Has dividers, pngs, frames ~ etc if you have the creative touch.

sozai-good - site I found recently that has a lot of pngs you can download, also has frames and borders. In japanese but isn't hard to translate. Everything is also sorted into sections.

lottie lab - Website useful for animating, can be used to move around PNGs for rentry and the like. I don't use it much myself atm, but it's pretty easy to get the hang of.

scripted.neocities - Neocities full of code you can use for bundlrs or carrd. Also useful for stuff like spacehey and other sites that use CSS / HTML

blinkies.cafe - Easily make or find blinkies here! Great for beginners who want to make some simple things.

emojicombos - Search practically anything and you'll find an emoji combo for it. Useful for finding symbol / text combos and kaomojis.

unicode character table - Has pretty much every single symbol you've seen or needed. You can find what you want pretty easily due to its sectioning. Has stuff like arrows , dingbats , brackets , etc etc..

yaytext - Make your text 𝙼𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚎! or U͟n͟d͟e͟r͟l͟i͟n͟e͟d͟!͟ easily with this website! May possibly break screenreaders in the process though so be warned.

lorem ipsum generator - Too lazy to generate a block of text to make a page look filled out, well look no longer! This site can quickly generate of block of pure gibberish to make it seem like there's actually text there! Good for newspaper / magazine gfx ~

And that's all ( for now )! I use most of all these sites and find them very useful! Hopefully one of them will prove useful to you too dear friend (❁´◡`❁)

[afloweroutofstone]

Hannah Arendt, who fled Germany in 1933, later wrote that long before Jews, Roma, gays, Communists and others could be herded into death camps, they had to be “denationalized” — excluded from the society that guaranteed their legal rights. Enlightenment thinkers had posited that just by virtue of existing, each person has inalienable rights. Arendt, however, observed that the “right to have rights” could be guaranteed only by a political community. Without a state to claim them as their own, people have no laws, no courts and no political mechanisms for protecting rights.

Arendt once said that “the generally political became a personal fate when one emigrated.” As a stateless person, she experienced that loss of rights — unable to get papers, hiding from the police, interned as an enemy alien in France — before making it to the United States. She was lucky. Her friend Walter Benjamin committed suicide in his eighth year of exile, when the French authorities blocked him from crossing the border ahead of advancing German troops...

A country that has pushed one group out of its political community will eventually push out others. The Trump administration’s barrage of attacks on trans people can seem haphazard, but as elements of a denationalization project, they fall into place...

The message, consistent and unrelenting, is that trans people are a threat to the nation. The subtext is that we are not of this nation...

The rights the Trump administration is taking away from trans people are relatively new. Only in the past few decades, for example, have clear legal procedures existed for changing the gender marker on identity documents, and only in the past few years have federal and some state authorities made the process fairly easy. But before transgender, gender-nonconforming and intersex people were recognized as a group — or groups — of people who had rights, many could blend in, fly below the radar. Now, in their new rightlessness, they are exposed...

Living with documents that are inconsistent or at odds with your public identity is no small thing. It can keep you from opening a bank account, applying for financial aid, securing a loan, obtaining a driver’s license and traveling freely and safely inside a country or across borders. I was once detained in Russia after a routine road check because an officer thought I was a teenage boy using his mother’s driver’s license.

It’s not just American identity documents that are being scrambled. Like all things American, Trump’s denationalization campaign affects people far beyond the United States. In late February, Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued visa guidelines, ostensibly designed to keep foreign trans athletes from competing in the United States, that seem to direct consular officers to deny entry to anyone whose gender markers appear different from their sex assigned at birth.

The new regulations require visitors, when filling out the paperwork to cross the border into the United States, to indicate the sex they were assigned at birth. Lucien Lambertz, a German curator who is trans and was planning a professional trip to the United States, told me they worried that they would be denied entry if they complied, indicating a birth sex different from the gender marker in their passport, but also if they didn’t comply.

Lambertz emailed the Foreign Ministry in their country to ask for guidance. “The issue is the subject of tense discussions here at the ministry, and your concerns are absolutely understandable,” the response read, in part. Ordinarily, the Foreign Ministry would suggest asking the U.S. Embassy, but by doing so, as the letter noted, Lambertz “would then ‘out’ yourself to them.”

Trans and nonbinary Germans fear that their country’s incoming conservative government may take its cues from the Trump administration. Far-right parties, ascendant in Germany and other European countries, have made the specter of “gender ideology” a centerpiece of their politics.

“Something has changed,” Heinrich Horwitz, a German choreographer, told me. Horwitz, who is nonbinary, was recently assaulted at the main train station in Vienna. The attacker was demanding to know whether Horwitz was “a girl or a boy.” Before they could make out what the attacker was saying, Horwitz instinctively tucked the Star of David they wear around their neck inside their shirt. “I thought that would be safer.” Horwitz, who was born in Munich in 1984, is the child of a Holocaust survivor. “I grew up with this idea that I could always go to the U.S. if the Nazis came back,” they told me. That no longer seems like an option.

You know how this column is supposed to end. I rehearse all the similarities between Jews in Germany in 1933 and trans people in the United States in 2025: the tiny fraction of the population, the barrage of bureaucratic measures that strip away rights, the vilifying rhetoric. The silence on the part of ostensible allies. (Trump spent about five minutes of his recent address to Congress specifically attacking trans people and 10 minutes attacking immigrants; the Democratic rebuttal mentioned immigrants once and trans people not at all.) Then I finish with the standard exhortation: The attacks won’t stop here. If you don’t stand up for trans people or immigrants, there won’t be anyone left when they come for you.

But I find that line of argument both distasteful and disingenuous. It is undoubtedly true that the Trump administration won’t stop at denationalizing trans people, but it is also true that a majority of Americans are safe from these kinds of attacks, just as a majority of Germans were. The reason you should care about this is not that it could happen to you but that it is already happening to others. It is happening to people who, we claim, have rights just because we are human. It is happening to me, personally.

[biscuitdolly]

hobbies to try out ♡

hobbies are such a great way to spend your time rather than being on technology all the time. It's great to have a skill, as skills can help you make friends, and can also open up new job opportunities!! here are some ideas, some are easy and simple and others are a little more advanced, there's (hopefully) something for everyone !!

O1 , painting / sketching

O2 , ballet (or dance in general)

O3 , sewing

O4 , reading

O5 , journalling

O6 , gardening

O7 , baking

O8 , photography

O9 , creative writing / songwriting / poem writing

1O , yoga

11 , learning an instrument (electric/acoustic guitar, drums, piano, violin etc)

12 , bracelet/jewellery making

13 , thrifting

14 , skateboarding

15 , hiking / exploring

16 , calligraphy

17 , pottery

18 , knitting / crochet

19 , pilates

2O , learning a language

21 , origami

22 , archery

23 , bird watching , herping , and animal/bug study in general

24 , mycology , plant observation/documentation

25 , start a podcast or amateur radio

26 , roller skating

27 , gymnastics / acrobatics

28 , cardistry

29 , terrarium making

30 , calisthenics

hope this helps!!!