#fuck matt walsh

[elierlick]

Of course he doesn't know what T4T is.

[wilwheaton]

(via mu6d134s3o3b1.png (PNG Image, 1182 × 1146 pixels))

[thee-radio-host-is-a-kookaburra]

this took way too long bc i had to do it frame-by-frame so i hope someone finds it useful. free to use ofc

[thatheathen]

Matt Walsh (self-proclaimed Theocratic Fascist) wants to exterminate trans people. It’s time to get meaner folks. I’m not fucking joking.

[troythecatfish]

[whatbigotspost]

Ohhhh this is RICH coming from the side of 45, Mitch McConnell, MTG, and other sentient boils who walk among us.

I'm actually deeply disinterested in equating someone's appearance with anything about their substance or character. That said, c'mon. Republicans are hideous 😂

[alli-the-tragic]

It's our fault that we cry at this preschool show that is more mature than 90% of adult animated shows. If you watch episodes like:

The Sign

Baby Race

Sleepytime

Space

Copycat

Camping

Army

Onesies

And some more that I couldn't think of off the top of my head but what I'm saying is that when you're an adult doesn't mean that you are not allowed to watch animated kids shows especially when the animation, writing, character arcs, are so high quality as an example.

It's just a rant of mine and I don't want to watch Matt Walsh's video because I don't want to give him further attention.

[samijami]

Every time this is reblogged. Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles lose a finger (so they can't tweet anymore)

And everytime this is liked, they regain a finger they've lost

[silvermoon424]

Thank you based Annamarie Forcino for dunking on Matt Walsh on behalf of all of us aces.

Everyone with basic human decency 🤝 Dunking on Matt Walsh

[kinghijinx22]

So I just opened Youtube and was fed right wing conspiracy theories and transphobic hate propaganda by known insane bigot Matt Walsh

If you see this add I would recommend blocking and reporting it for the promoting of false information that it is. This is Youtube and Google spreading right wing conspiracy theories that are designed to get trans people discriminated against and killed. It is false information that has been disproven by actual medical professionals, gender dysphoria is real, trans people are real and Matt Walsh is a grifter who spreads fearmongering hate propaganda with conspiracy theories and false information because he can't handle people existing outside of his tiny view of the world. He is a dictator who obsesses over genitals and wants to dictate the entire lives of other living beings based on want genitals they were born with. And to Youtube and Google, STOP ADVERTISING HIS INSANE RAMBLINGS! STOP ADVERTISING FASCIST PROPAGANDA AND BIGOTRY! You are trying to get people killed by doing this.

[silver-ace-of-spades]

Mattress Walsh, Air Jordans Peterson, Benitalia Shapiro, Michael Knows Less, Charizard Kirk, Pennis Drager, Steven Chowder, Jowling Kowling Rowling, Tronald Dump, Mike Penis, Candy Owned, Majority Trailor-Greens, Lauren Boobert, Tedophile Cruise, Rhonda Sand Tits, and their fans shut the fuck up challenge (impossible)

[jibbi]

Matt Walsh Wrongly Calls Out Someone Who's Ace

So, ever since last month, I've been a bit heated about Matt Walsh making a video on (or close to) Valentine's Day putting down an asexual girl briefly speaking in an article about what she enjoys doing on Valentine's Day for herself. Listen, I'm heated about most things this man says and how hateful he is, especially towards anyone - mainly us trans folks - in the LGBT+ community. But the fact that he constantly says how we sexualize so many other people and things yet completely contradicts his usual narrative by insulting someone who isn't even interested in sex just really struck an extra nerve.

I was happy to see The Queer Kiwi and Annamarie Forcino recently call him out on this video, but I wanted to bring some more attention to it, speaking from my own experience as an aro-ace person and what I've learned. I feel like there's hardly ever enough light shined on aro-ace folks, but we certainly didn't deserve a negative light shined on us by Matt Walsh, one of the most massive bigots out there.

Touching on Demi Romantics/Sexuals

So Matt had read direct definitions about being asexual and aromantic, and one of the sub-labels that was defined within that definition was demisexuality and demiromanticism. Of course Matt had to make a comment about this, saying how making a friend and falling in love with them is a normal person's emotions and experience.

However, I will say I do understand where that misguidance comes from, considering it's what I originally thought too when trying to gain an understanding of demisexuality (even Annamarie expressed this misunderstanding in her video, too). So let me just give a breakdown on why this is a common notion amongst people who don't fully understand demisexuality/demiromanticism:

It's a very common plot in fictional romance for two people who are already friends (or who develop a friendship) to fall in love with each other. And naturally, when people think of a common romance story, they think of that plot and/or maybe it's something they themselves have experienced or want to experience. So, they think just about everyone else also feels that way or has had that same/similar experience. But, the truth of the matter is, that's not necessarily what everyone wants and/or has and most importantly, it's not something allo folks need to build a relationship.

Lemme explain. For allo people, it can be a want but it's not a needed thing in order for them to simply develop any sort of romantic and/or sexual attraction to someone. That's the biggest thing. Demisexual and demiromantic people absolutely need that deep platonic connection with someone in order to develop that desire for a romantic relationship or sex life with them.

A lot of allo people are able to look at someone or know someone for a very short span of time, and desire that sexual and/or romantic relationship with them, feel that attraction to them without knowing them well. That isn't something that happens for demi rom/sexual people.

Asexual people aren't miserable & narcissistic

Matt talks about how ace people live sad, pathetic lives just because they're don't want sex and, are making up a label just to mask their low libido or want for sex but not getting it and to feel good about themselves since they're narcissists.

Man, that is one of the stupidest things I think I've ever heard. Asexuals don't necessarily need to experience sex to be happy, hence why they're asexuals. Also, that is exactly what Odel Pax is trying to get across in the article - she's asexual but that doesn't wreck her Valentine's Day.

Also, I feel like the word "narcissist" gets tossed around so much without fully understanding how serious of a term it is and what actual signs of being a narcissist are. For instance, a very big sign of a narcissist is having a strong disregard for other's emotions and having no problem manipulating their emotion's for their own personal gain. That's not what LGBT+ people do. They're just trying to live their lives and shine a spotlight on their identity to bring awareness about what they experience in hopes of helping and educating others.

Matt often tries to say that people in the LGBT+ community are narcissists because they're "entitled" and all they want is attention yet can't take harsh feedback, when that's not the case at all considering so many bigots - like him - say such foul things about them and make them more oppressed. Like, why would anyone want that? Why would anyone fake being queer for attention when half of it is extremely negative attention that includes threats? Yet here he is saying they're the least oppressed people to walk this earth.

Also, sexual attraction and libido are not the same thing. Libido is someone's sex drive; that natural bodily sense of needing that pleasure that sex gives. Sexual attraction mainly refers to that want for sex, especially with another person. For instance, in my own experience, sometimes I do have that bit of a sex drive because it's something my body naturally sees as a need but do I often feel a sexual attraction? No, not really. Having actual sex with someone isn't something I enjoy much at all, and I often don't feel sexually attracted to others. But, seeing as how this is something I can't control - I've just always been this way - I'm asexual. It's not a chosen thing or something I see as made up when it's an actual emotion I feel and have no control over.

I think a decent analogy for what I said is when you need a drink after a run you just went on. Your body needs the fluid but someone only has a drink for you that you don't like. However, it's all you have and it's still a drink. So you still drink it even though you don't really like the taste. That's what it's like when your libido increases but you're on the ace-spec. (Also, just to clarify, just because someone's libido has risen doesn't mean they necessarily want to or feel comfortable satisfying that need/craving).

Romantic Attraction & Sexual Attraction are different

I feel like this isn't hard to understand. Matt says these two are "synonymous" but they aren't. There's a reason why I've been separating the words aromantic and asexual throughout this breakdown of his video - because they're different. You aren't romantically attracted to every person you're sexually attracted to, and vice versa. This applies to people who aren't even on the a-spec. Annamarie explains this is her video, too. I too do not get how Matt doesn't understand this concept.

He also states that when you tell someone you want to date them but don't want sex with them you have given them no useful information. Like what. That's directly explaining that you are romantically attracted to this person but not sexually attracted. Not all relationships involve sex nor need to. You don't have to have sex with someone to love them or vice versa.

Conclusion

Matt Walsh as usual calls someone out who he doesn't understand and doesn't make the effort to understand. He wrongly stated things about an asexual person and said they're not asexual - those aren't facts, that's just him making things up and spewing his own opinion.

Matt doesn't care about the LGBT+ community and he'll keep stating all these wrong, made up things about us. He's not smart, he's hateful, so don't let him tell you who you are.

I'm always glad to advocate for my community. I wanted to call him out and properly explain things on the a-spec. I'd love to do posts about his terrible opinions on trans people and other gay people, but that would take a very long time seeing as how he targets them even more than the aro-ace community within the LGBT+ community.

[nerdyerror]

Matt Walsh is dumb and ugly and afraid of rainbows so heres a double rainbow

[thee-radio-host-is-a-kookaburra]

i hope Matt Walsh dies and i’m 100% serious. tumblr would take down my post if i went into detail so just pretend i just typed a really horrible way to die

[sbelikeswords]

Another M*tt W*lsh post

The most chilling thing about the M*tt W*lsh hack, to me, is an email between him & Cr*wder, where he said:

"There's certainly plenty of money to be made when you can get millions of hits online, and I'm a capitalist and I have a family, so I've decided to start getting serious about that."

Like

He doesn't even care

He doesn't care about trans people

He doesn't care about women's rights or whatever

He doesn't care about children

He doesn't care about any of the stuff he's staked his entire career on

He just cares about money

How anybody can see a monster like that becoming extremely wealthy and famous by espousing a hatred that he doesn't even really care about and will never see the effects of, and not walk away understanding that capitalism is an irredeemably evil system is beyond me.

He's doing it because our world was built in a way that allows him to use hatred to become incredibly wealthy.

Fuck Matt Walsh, but fuck the entire system that allowed him to do this

[melancholypilled]

i never understood why “what is a woman” is such a difficult question for people, like if you asked someone “what is a person?” they are going to uncontroversially say “homosapien” without worrying about hurting anyone’s feelings.

unlike the term “child” and “adult” the definition of woman has NEVER been legally/biologically ambiguous or varied, So why is it so hard to say female human?