#Dissertation guidelines

[aimlayworldwide]

Know The Difference Between Dissertation Writing & Thesis Writing

In the realm of academia, the terms "dissertation" and "thesis" are often used interchangeably, leading to confusion among students and researchers. However, there are subtle differences between the two, both in terms of purpose and structure. In this article, we shed light on the disparity between dissertation writing and thesis writing, offering clarity to those embarking on their advanced academic journeys. 

Purpose and Audience 

The primary difference lies in the purpose and intended audience of the documents. A thesis is typically associated with master's programs, while a dissertation is commonly associated with doctoral programs. A thesis aims to demonstrate the student's mastery of knowledge within a specific field and is typically evaluated by a committee consisting of faculty members. On the other hand, a dissertation is an original research project that contributes new insights or knowledge to the existing body of literature within the respective field of study. Dissertations are often evaluated by a committee of experts in the field and may have a broader readership. 

Scope and Depth of Research 

Another crucial distinction between dissertations and thesis is the scope and depth of research conducted. While a thesis focuses on synthesizing existing knowledge and demonstrating proficiency in a particular subject area, a dissertation requires original research. Dissertations demand a more extensive investigation, involving data collection, analysis, and interpretation, to produce novel findings or perspectives. Dissertations typically contribute to advancing the understanding of a field or addressing gaps in existing knowledge, whereas thesis focus on a comprehensive understanding of a specific topic. 

Length and Structure 

In general, dissertations tend to be longer and more comprehensive than thesis. A thesis usually ranges from 50 to 100 pages, whereas a dissertation can span from 100 to several hundred pages. This disparity in length is reflective of the differing levels of research and analysis conducted. However, the specific requirements regarding length and structure can vary between institutions and academic disciplines, so it is essential to consult the guidelines provided by the respective program or department. 

Originality and Contribution 

As mentioned earlier, one of the fundamental aspects of a dissertation is its originality. Dissertations are expected to contribute something new to the field, whether it is through the discovery of new knowledge, the development of a new theory or framework, or the application of existing knowledge in a novel context. Thesis, on the other hand, are focused on synthesizing existing information and demonstrating the student's ability to critically analyze and evaluate existing research. 

Time and Complexity 

Given the difference in scope and depth of research, dissertations typically require a more extended period to complete compared to thesis. The process of conducting original research, collecting data, analyzing findings, and writing a comprehensive dissertation demands substantial time and effort. Thesis, while still requiring rigorous analysis and synthesis, can often be completed within a shorter timeframe. 

Conclusion 

While the terms "dissertation" and "thesis" are often used interchangeably, understanding the distinctions between them is crucial for students and researchers. Dissertations are characterized by original research, a broader scope, and a contribution to the existing body of knowledge, while thesis focus on synthesizing existing information and demonstrating mastery of a subject. By comprehending these differences in purpose, scope, length, and originality, students can embark on their academic journeys equipped with a clear understanding of the expectations associated with dissertation writing and thesis writing. 

[bibleofficial]

the reason i’m avoiding doing this work is bc i’ll have to move on to the next project & idk if i still have access to cad/sketchup & im too scared to find out lol

[clareguilty]

Kinktober 2024

Howdy y'all! I JUST turned in my dissertation so I'm all done with grad school. This means I'll be able to do Kinktober this year <3 I can't guarantee that I'll be able to continue after this year but I also don't want to feel like I'm scaring people into participating. I just want to let everyone know that I really do love these events and I look forward to it all year, so I may try and find a way to make it work even after this one.

I’m looking at opening up about 5 slots this year with recommended donations of $18-22 for ~2k words per piece.

Reserved

Open

Open

Open

Open

I'm starting early so I have plenty of time to write between my other projects, and also to hopefully give everyone more time to get a slot.

Fandoms I will write for include (I'm so sorry I've been living in a shack without internet I'm not caught up on anything):

COD MW2

RDR2

Resident Evil 8 Lady Dimitrescu

Mandalorian

Witcher

Signalis (NOT Adler)

Guidelines

Reader insert only as always

Specify the gender of the reader character. I write cis and trans characters I just need specifics

Give me a detailed prompt with enough specifics and meat for me to go off of. A setup, a trope, please specify who is dominant/giving/topping in NSFW scenarios.

I don’t write modern AU for RDR2 and pregnancy is a squick for me. Otherwise, I feel like I've gotten more comfortable with ALL the fucked up and weird kinks. Try me. I don't judge.

Also, feel free to combine 2 or 3 kinks into one prompt if you think they’d go well together!

[imbackonmy-bullshit]

Watching hot fuzz again for the first time post autism diagnosis is fucking wild

Nick is so autistic;

constantly baffled by NT bullshit

he has like two facial expressions the entire movie,

needs excess alcohol to relax in a social setting,

routine procedure official guideline rule rule rule,

communication is either monotone and formal or completely falls apart when under stress and ends up yelling,

misses Danny's Birthday and then just leaves to correct it with no explanation which probably looks rude as hell.

Stimming with his hand grip thing

Hates being touched by anyone that he's not super comfortable with (danny)

I could write an entire dissertation

[workingtowardsthatphd]

Sunday 5th May

T-minus two days until the final draft of my dissertation is due in. Honestly, the idea of just letting it loose into the world like that scares me, I think this must be what it feels like when your child grows up into an adult.

Incomplete from Yesterday:

Finish writing first draft of Chapter 3

Re-write the introduction using the chapters as a guideline. (1000 words)

To do:

Write conclusion (1000 words)

Write the abstract.

Work out the formatting.

Complete:

Chapter 3 draft 1, 1933 words. Still missing a conclusion, but I'll add that in on the re-write.

Introduction finalised: 1280 words, slightly more than I wanted, but it should be fine.

Written the abstract (still not entirely sure about it, but my supervisor said not to worry too much.)

Worked out the formatting, added in the intro, abstract, chapters 1 & 2.

Hoo boy. I've actually got everything written somehow. It's formatted into one document, so I'm gonna leave it for now and come back later to go over and check for any basic errors before I submit.

Cups of coffee: ☕

[thatfrenchacademic]

do you have any advice for someone going into writing their bachelor's thesis? I'm having trouble pinning down a topic that seems manageable.

Hello!

This will be highly field dependent, so my advice will be most relevant for social sciences and humanities - anyone from STEM, fell free to chip in as well!

Let's see, if a student came in at office hours and asked me this, I would probably break it down like this :

Get familiar with the expectations

A thesis the first big, semi-independent work you will have to conduct, so it's uncharted territory. Get rid of the anxiety by looking again, and again, and again, at any guidelines set by your course director, school, college. How long is it supposed to be ? Is there a set structure ? Is there a first draft due before the final draft ?

Look at dissertation from previous years! Ideally, find at least 3 so you can have an idea of how diverse the work can be.

2. Talk to your supervisor

And don't bullshit your way into impressing them. If you are absolutely lost - tell them. If you already have an idea - tell them. If you hesitate before three topics - tell them. That first meeting is where you lay down all the ground work. In all likelihood your supervisor barely knows you, so give them something to work with !They want you to do well!

3. Start broad, then narrow it down, narrow it down, narrow it down

"Pinning down a topic" is an iterative process, but the good part is that it's also an introspective one, in my opinion. It's the art of peeling back layers to figure out what, EXACTLY, is it that you want to know.

For example: let's say you want to broadly talk about accessibility in higher education. Ok, great ! But what exactly, is it that makes it interesting to you ? Have a sit down with yourself. Are you wondering how higher education defines disability ? Or is it about how disability impacts entrance into higher education ? Or specifically access to teaching resources ? It could be about the architecture and physical design of campus spaces, or it could be about the lived experience of disabled students ?

Some of these you will not be that interested in, some of them you are interested in but not in an "academic" sense, ... so you can start to narrow it down. Some you may already have a vague answer in your mind, so then you play the three year old toddler with your self, by asking "but why", "but why" until you feel like you have reached the real crux of the issue.

Throughout this process, you can 1) take peaks are the relevant literature to help you move the thought process along and 2) talk with your supervisor so they can steer you in a productive direction.

Because...

4. You are looking for a Good Bachelors Dissertation Now (TM).

Broadly this is what you want to keep in mind :

A good bachelors dissertation for you, with this supervisor is not a good PhD dissertation, not a dissertation that would be great with another supervisor, not a dissertation that doesn't fit your degree... It is good in its context, and that context is :

you + your supervisor + now

Don't feel disappointed or frustrated if you are steered in a slightly different direction - it may be one where your supervisor can actually help you better. Or if you are asked to downscale or scope down: better a narrower dissertation where all is properly covered than a too ambitious one that you will not able to carry out properly give the limits of the format.

Hope that helps!

[bookofjin]

Great respect to the project you’re undertaking here.

I was wondering if you had any sources on Empress Wu of the Tang though? I’ve been researching her as part of my undergrad dissertation and have reached a road-block in the mention of the ‘Biographies of Notable Women’ 列女傳 or ‘Guidelines for Imperial Subjects’ 臣軌 allegedly worked on by some of her officials (the North Gate Scholars) c. 680s

The former [Biographies of Notable Women] seems similar to/the same as the original compiled by Liu Xiang c. 18BCE, as well as your translated extracts from Chapter 96 of the Book of Jin and other sections on exemplary women.

I’d love to know if there’s anything available regarding an English translation of either new/old Books of Tang too, and the Zizhi Tongjian, specifically volumes concerning or mentioning the Empress Wu or anything mentioning women and gender.

Regards!

Sorry, I haven't read very much about the Tang, so I can't really help you. Maybe @craftercat has some input?

[februaryfangfest]

Hey y'all. We're in the final stretch of things, and so here are your guidelines for how to submit your work.

Posting Details

Here is our Ao3 Collection for the Event. Your works should be sumbitted here by the 1st of February. They will remain unrevealed until the event, and we'll reveal new works each day of the event.

If you are posting fanart, you should still post this to ao3 and our collection there, but you will need to host the images offsite. Here are Ao3 guidelines for how. You can take try using private tumblr posts or discord links, but here are three free image hosting site options that allow adult content: Postimages, put.re, and Macintosh Garden.

Event Rules

The theme is Valentine. All submissions should try to incorporate the theme in some way (even if it's a small way).

All submissions must be your own creation and cannot have been posted publicly beforehand. Fresh creative blood must be spilt!

Stories and artwork can be set at any point in the past or future, in hidden glimpses we never saw in the show, reunion stories, worlds where Darla’s still around, etc. The characters can be souled or unsouled or in any what-if or AU your heart can dream up.

Your work must involve at least two members of the Fanged Four. The main ship should be the Fanged Four or one of the sub-pairings (Spangel, Dangel, Sprusilla, Darsilla, etc).

Minimum word count for fic is 100 words. There’s no maximum - one shots and chaptered works are equally welcome, but they should be complete and not part of a pre-existing fic series.

Any rating is welcome for both fics and art, but please tag responsibly.

No bashing of the group or its members, please. We’re here to show them love. This is a celebration of the characters and their dynamics with each other, not the place for your dissertation on which vampire is better or worse than the others. They're all good vamps, Bront.

Be excellent to each other!

Our Discord is here if you have any questions, or want to chat with everyone about the Fanged Four and Fangfest. It's also where we'll be hosting our watch parties during the event.

[gothhabiba]

[...] Ms. Zkik explained that Plug-in [a company hired to translate and voice act dubbings of foreign films and television into Moroccan Arabic] was not entirely free in the choice of language it used in dubbing in Moroccan Arabic. Ismail, a voice actor at Plug-in who I met on one of my visits, explained to me that during the first year he began dubbing at Plug-in there were specific guidelines from their client, the broadcasting station 2M, regarding register and lexical choice. For example, during recordings he said that he had been specifically told not to use the word “tomobil”[,] a frequently used word for ‘car’[,] because it was a clear French borrowing. The term “siya:ra” [سيارة] ‘car’ was preferred due to its Standard Arabic origin. Ismail interpreted these guidelines as both a desire by 2M to create a truly “Moroccan” dubbing in that linguistic reminders of a French colonial influence had been minimized. He also saw it as a nod to viewers who use other varieties of Arabic and who may not understand French borrowings into Moroccan Arabic.

— Jennifer Lee Hall, Debating Darija: Language Ideology and the Written Representation of Moroccan Arabic in Morocco (PhD dissertation), 2015, pp. 76-9.

(the "during recordings" is misplaced—Hall means that Ismail was not to use the word "tomobil" while recording dubs, not that he communicated this to her during said recordings)

this is really interesting to me. the presence of French (and, to a lesser extent, Spanish) borrowings is a distinctive feature of Moroccan Darija, especially that of the northern cities, and one that most speakers of other varieties of Arabic would know to associate with Morocco. I've heard people associate it more with Moroccan Darija than with e.g. Algerian or Tunisian, even (tho' this is an association, not something that I've sought to substantiate empirically).

Tajine Qui Parle only lists طُموبيلة "Tomobila" and طُموبيل "Tomobil" for "voiture" ("car"); wiktionary indicates that سيارة "car" is used in Standard, Kuwaiti Gulf, and Moroccan Arabic (with expected differences in pronounciation), and also gives a couple different possible spellings for طمبيل "Tomobil" (which it lists as a word only in "Moroccan Arabic"); it gives سيارة ("siyyaara") as a Moroccan Arabic word, but notes that it is "uncommon."

the idea that a word of Standard Arabic origin is automatically "more Moroccan" than a word of French origin, despite that fact that as far as I can tell "Tomobil" is more distinctively Moroccan, is on its surface kind of bizarre, but it makes sense when you consider the recent colonial underpinnings of French borrowings into Moroccan Arabic. the post-colonial process of Arabisation is a process of nationalisation, of creating a national myth around (the repression of Amazigh identity and communist movements in favour of) a desired "Islamic" "Arab-ness"—which is, however, like Frenchness, a language and culture that was introduced or imposed on North Africa and is not "original" to it (not that any culture is completely "original" and free from shifting or borrowings!—rather that the "originality" of Arabic to Morocco seems to be a myth that is being drawn on here).

given that shows dubbed in Moroccan Arabic are to teach the public "good" spoken Darija, they can be analysed in terms of how the ethos of Arabisation connects education with nation: "generaliz[ing] the Arabic language" in order to both "democratiz[e] access to education and affirm[] the Arab identity of the Kingdom" (Youssef Sourgo, Morocco World News). and Arabisation also, of course, paradoxically relies on looking outside Morocco in order to institute Morocco's "Moroccanization":

After its independence, Morocco could not yet aspire to a successful arabization with the lack of professors of Arabic in the kingdom. To remedy this problem, Morocco hired professors from other countries, such as Egypt, Syria and Sudan. (ibid.)

it seems pertinent that, in a discussion about Arabisation, I once heard someone state that the removal of French from buildings and other public spaces was "good," and then also share with me a personal, familial myth that their family, like "all Arabs," had "come from the Middle East" (I think these are direct quotes from a conversation that took place in English?)

it should also be mentioned that words of Standard Arabic origin may be preferred even if the alternative is not (so far as I can tell) a European borrowing: Hall recounts one Moroccan woman noting approvingly that a dubbed Mexican show depicted a married woman who '“properly” referred to her mother-in-law as ‘ḥma:ti’ [حماتي]* instead of as ‘ʻduza’ [عدوزة] or worse ‘ʻguza’ [عݣوزة],' which latter two words the woman associated with 'a rural background and lack of education' (pp. 203-4). it's furthermore interesting to me that she described عݣوزة as "worse" than a word that's identical except for its inclusion of the gaf (ݣ; /g/; hard "g" sound), given that gaf is not in the Standard Arabic abjad, while dal (د; /d/) is!

*حما hma "in-law" (+ ة -a [singular feminine marker], which is then removed when the possessive is added) + تي -ty [1st-person singular possessive marker for a word ending in ة].

[chaotic-archaeologist]

Hello! I have a specific american archaeology thing and thought of this blog first - I've got a friend who's doing her dissertation on how Native Americans are represented in academia and public opinion/popular culture, and she's trying to track down some specific textbooks used in US high schools (she's working in the UK so limited access). Was wondering if you or anyone else might be able to point her towards a pdf or smth? If so I can follow up with the specific titles she's after

Well I only did two years of high school, so I don't actually remember all that much from my own textbooks. But I would look on the Internet Archive or LibGen for PDFs of books. States will also have guidelines for what textbooks to use in their curriculum (and yes, this does vary from state to state—it's not standardized) if she's looking for specific examples.

As always, people are welcome to chime in with other resources.

-Reid

[dissertationwritinghelpforstds]

Basic Structure of a Scientific Paper to Write.

The fundamental structure of a scientific paper is encapsulated by the acronym IMRAD, which stands for Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. This structure is integral to original research articles and facilitates clear and organized presentation of research findings. Each component of IMRAD serves a distinct purpose:

Introduction: Presents the research question and its significance.

Methods: Describes the procedures and techniques used to conduct the study.

Results: Summarizes the data and findings of the research.

Discussion: Interprets the findings, linking them back to the research question and broader context.

In addition to IMRAD, scientific papers typically include a title page, abstract, keywords, tables, graphs, figures, acknowledgments, and references. Each element contributes to the overall clarity and accessibility of the research.

Types of Papers

Scientific journals publish various types of papers, each serving a specific purpose and judged by distinct criteria. Understanding these types can help authors select the most appropriate format for their work, thus maximizing the impact and acceptance chances of their manuscript. The main types of papers include:

Original Article: Reports new research findings based on original research. This is the most critical paper type, often subdivided into Major Papers and Original Reports.

Case Report: Describes unique cases that provide new insights or highlight unusual clinical conditions.

Technical Note: Details specific techniques, procedures, or new equipment relevant to a medical field.

Pictorial Essay: Focuses on the educational value of high-quality images, often used in teaching.

Review: Summarizes recent developments on a specific topic without introducing new data.

Commentary: Offers personal perspectives on current issues or controversial topics.

Editorial: Provides short reviews or critiques of articles published in the same journal issue.

Letter to the Editor: Allows for short communications on various subjects, including comments on previously published articles.

Preparing the Manuscript

Authors must tailor their manuscripts to the type of paper they are writing, following specific guidelines and structures. For example:

Original Articles should follow the IMRAD structure with a detailed methods section and robust statistical analysis.

Case Reports often have a simpler structure with a focus on the unique aspects of the case and their implications.

Technical Notes and Pictorial Essays emphasize methods and visual elements, respectively, with concise text sections.

Reviews and Commentaries should be well-organized with comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature and clear presentation of viewpoints.

Enhancing Chances of Acceptance

To enhance the chances of manuscript acceptance, authors should:

Adhere to the journal’s specific guidelines outlined in the “Instructions to Authors” or “Guide for Authors.”

Ensure their manuscript is well-structured, clear, and concise.

Select the most appropriate type of paper for their research.

Include all necessary components, such as a structured abstract, relevant keywords, and thorough references.

Conclusion

Familiarity with the basic structure and types of scientific papers, as well as adherence to journal guidelines, is crucial for authors aiming to publish their work successfully. By choosing the appropriate format and meticulously preparing their manuscripts, authors can effectively communicate their research and increase their chances of acceptance in reputable journals. This structured approach not only maximizes the material’s impact but also contributes to the advancement of scientific knowledge in the medical field.

Investing in your academic future with Dissertation Writing Help For Students means choosing a dedicated professional who understands the complexities of dissertation writing and is committed to your success. With a comprehensive range of services, personalized attention, and a proven track record of helping students achieve their academic goals, I am here to support you at every stage of your dissertation journey.

Feel free to reach out to me at helpmyassignment51@gmail.com to commence a collaborative endeavor towards scholarly excellence. Whether you seek guidance in crafting a compelling research proposal, require comprehensive editing to refine your dissertation, or need support in conducting a thorough literature review, I am here to facilitate your journey towards academic success. and discuss how I can assist you in realizing your academic aspirations.

[spurgie-cousin]

I answered that I think they’re a unique cult because they’ve remixed what we know to be biblical history/christian theology. The fact that they have a whole new book that’s got nothing to do with anything we know to be biblical is what does it for me (with the origins of said book including weird interactions with salamanders). Mormon dogma teaches that Jesus somehow made his way to North America post resurrection, which if you have a basic knowledge of history should raise a few flags. They also don’t believe that the bible is the singular word of God, which if you follow the guidelines of fundamentalism seems quite necessary for christians.

There’s a lot more I could say but this is a summary for now 😂

so i guess the way i think about it is, Mormons are not unique when it comes to changing Christian history/altering the bible/creating new religious texts to fit a certain narrative, that is a hallmark of pretty much all of the big Christian cults. they are not even the only sect of Christianity that denies the trinity, just to address a point made in the second ask.

there's definitely an argument to be made that Mormonism is one of the most successful of these types of cults so maybe it deserves its own category for that reason, but then you open up the Pandora's box of defining a "Christian Cult" and a lot of denominations can also end up in that group just based on what you decide that definition is (this is the part of the discussion where everyone gets mad at the dinner table). Like for example if we're just going by who doesn't believe in the holy trinity, United Pentecostals or any Unitarians, in addition to others, would fall under the 'cult' umbrella.

the big ones off the top of my head that are comparable in the sense that they've altered Christian history/written their own religious texts/added to or omitted from the original Bible are Jehovah's Witnesses, Unification Church, Twelve Tribes, the People's Temple and The Family (but that's in no way an exhaustive list). and for example, the Unification Church has a document that could be compared to Mormonism's D&C (basically a book about Joseph Smith's 'revelations') called "Divine Principal", which like the D&C was written by the founder of that religion and is revered almost above the original Bible.

i'm going to stop myself from writing a dissertation but essentially, i think Mormonism seems different from what most people think of when they think about "Christian" cults because it's one of the only cults of this nature to gain the prominence and status it currently has in society. most cults like this either fizzle out or go rogue enough to make their nature more obvious to outsiders, if that makes sense, while Mormonism at this time is considered a completely legitimate international religion. but there are definitely comparable organizations out there that are widely considered to be "Christian" cults.

[neurodivergent-uni-support-group]

How to plan a basic university essay and word count

You can make a formula for anything if you try hard enough and that's what I did with essays! Keep in mind that i have been entirely based in the School of English in UK universities but I feel like this should be relatively easy to edit to fit other types of essays.

Step One - What topic do you want to write about and what are the main arguments you want to hit?

You could probably avoid doing this if you really wanted but it makes the whole thing so much easier if you at least have a vague idea what you want to write about. You don't even have to know the arguments, but at least have some idea how many you want to hit.

Step Two - Is this essay better led by your main arguments or your data?

There have been two main essay structures I've used and they haven't failed me so far! The first one I will call the 'argument-led structure'. This is where you choose around 3 main arguments or themes and do a section focused on each, leading to a essay structure like the following:

1. Introduction

2. Argument/Theme 1

3. Argument/Theme 2

4. Argument/Theme 3

5. Conclusion

This structure is most useful when the essay you are writing is more of a review of current literature rather than one focused on collecting your own data and conducting an investigation. However, if you want a more typical structure to your essay or are doing a big project like a dissertation, you may prefer what I will call a 'data-led structure'.

1. Introduction

2. Literature Review

3. Methodology

4. Results

5. Discussion (Analysis, combining results and literature)

6. Conclusion

Depending on how long your essay is, you can add sections, combine them (usually Results and Discussion) or move them around. As long as you make it clear to the reader what you are doing, what literature you are using as support and what findings you are making, the rest should fall into place in time.

Step Three - How many words is your essay?

Whatever amount it is probably isn't enough for everything you want to cover, so maybe keep an idea in mind of which arguments should be prioritised over others. Some people can just use the word count as a guide overall but I don't know how to function like that, so I set separate word limits for each section. It's very likely you will go over or under these section word counts anyway and that's fine, but it also makes you aware of how much you're writing compared to expectations as you go.

For an argument-led structure, all of the central sections are likely to be around the same length anyway so it is relatively simple. Take your word count, combine introduction and conclusion into one section, count how many sections you now have and divide. This is mainly because the introduction and conclusion likely won't be anywhere near as long as the middle sections, so they can have the word limit of half of a main section each. It is likely that the conclusion will have more words than the introduction but it at least works as a guideline. I will write out an example, to make this process a bit clearer.

Word limit: 5000 words

Structure: Introduction, 3 main sections, conclusion

5000 ÷ 4 = 1250, 1250 ÷ 2 = 625

Introduction (625 words), 3 main sections (1250 words each), Conclusion (625 words)

Doing this for a data-led structure is a bit more difficult but not impossible. Just as the introduction and conclusion were combined, other sections can be paired up in a similar way depending on whether they are likely to be smaller or larger.

Word limit: 5000 words

Structure: Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, Discussion, Conclusion

Thoughts: Results doesn't need to be as long as the other sections, but Discussion will need to be longer. They can be paired up and some of the words from Results can go to Discussion. Introduction and Conclusion only need the combined words of a section, but conclusion will have slightly more.

5000 ÷ 5 = 1000 words, 1000 ÷ 2 = 500

Introduction (250-500 words), Literature Review (1000 words), Methodology (1000 words), Results (500-1000 words), Discussion (1000-1500 words), Conclusion (500-750 words)

Step Four - Add notes to your plan

Now just make the plan as detailed as you want! Add relevant literature for each section, figure out what arguments you are making, write down a random really cool-sounding sentence that just popped into your head. This all helps me, but I'm just one person. Get out there and figure out what works best for you!

[mysticfemme]

I got given some feedback on the second assignment I ever did at university over two years ago (feedback was two years old too) from a senior lecturer and they said my academic voice was strong and that what had been submitted at the time showed great promise 🥹

It was submitted for publication but bc it was a really limited assignment and not long enough it didn't meet the guidelines (also again, literally my second assignment ever) but one of my old lecturers today told me that I could work on it and resubmit it for publication next year or give them my final dissertation instead (if it was good enough)

[susansontag]

really struggling with the structure of my dissertation... sorry that all my posts are about this rn it’s all I can think about. the guidelines they give you has managed to confuse me greatly bc it discusses two things as though they should be in separate sections but when I read example dissertations it seems no one has done that and certainly I’d never think of doing an essay in that way

[malulurivers]

I moved!

hey yall!

i've been meaning to move to this blog for a while and i've finally decided to do it! now that my exams are over (god help me with my dissertation lmao--)

anyway, i used to be @lemonietrinket for anyone into kpop, but it's been a long long time since i've truly been a part of the fandom, and i think it's safe to say now that it played its part in my life well, but now it's time for me to move on.

i'm interested in writing for other fandoms now though that summer is rolling around and i would really like to stretch my writing legs a bit again! and not.. like.. drift absently through the days like i normally do in the summer so here i am!

fandoms i'm going to write for are Zelda and Arcane for now, predominantly 'x reader' stuff, though i might branch out! as well as requests...? who knows! but i only write SFW things! i'm considering opening an ao3 account for when things get going again, but for now i'll just be here :))

anyway, i'll fix up a masterlist and request guidelines thingy later. wish me luck :))

~ malu